Skip to main content
Also available in 2 other languages

ไทยTiếng Việt

Beginner 5 min read

What nuclear accidents taught us about radiation and cancer

NCI's fact sheet on nuclear accidents: what research after Chernobyl found about thyroid cancer in exposed children and leukemia in cleanup workers.

NCI source:NCI last reviewed 2022-05-12

Review status: AI-assisted, source checked. Not reviewed by a clinician. How we check pages

The short answer

After the 1986 Chernobyl accident, children and adolescents exposed to radioactive iodine went on to have an increased risk of thyroid cancer, and cleanup workers had an increased risk of leukemia. An NCI-led study found each gray of I-131 exposure was associated with a doubling of thyroid cancer risk, and that the raised risk lasted at least 30 years. Genomic analysis of children born to exposed parents found no increase in new genetic changes.

  • Radioactive isotopes released at Chernobyl included I-131, Cs-134, Cs-137 and Sr-90.

  • Children and adolescents exposed to I-131 showed an increased risk of thyroid cancer.

  • In an NCI-led study, each gray of I-131 exposure was associated with a doubling of thyroid cancer risk, and that risk stayed high for at least 30 years.

  • Cleanup workers, studied as a group, were found to have an increased risk of leukemia.

Choose how you want to read this

The whole article, with every detail and caution.

Decades of follow-up, one accident

Most of what we reliably know about radiation released from a nuclear power plant comes from studying what happened after April 1986 at Chernobyl. NCI's fact sheet on nuclear power plant accidents is built largely on that research, and this page follows the same source rather than going beyond it.

The radioactive forms of elements (isotopes) released included I-131, Cs-134, Cs-137, and Sr-90. These are different radioactive substances, and they behave differently in the body. That is part of why the health effects were not all the same.

The thyroid finding

Studies of children and teens exposed to I-131 from the accident found a higher risk of thyroid cancer.

The reason comes down to ordinary body function. The thyroid gland uses iodine to make its hormones, and it cannot tell the difference between ordinary iodine and the radioactive kind. Radioactive iodine that enters the body collects there, delivering its dose to one small organ.

An NCI-led study measured this link. The higher a person's dose of I-131, the more likely they were to develop thyroid cancer. Each gray (a unit of radiation dose) of exposure was linked to a doubling of risk.

The part that surprised people

I-131 has a half-life of about eight days. A half-life is the time it takes for half of a radioactive substance to break down. Within a few months, almost none of it is left. You might expect the risk to fade quickly too.

It did not. The study found that the higher thyroid cancer risk stayed high for at least 30 years.

The radiation left quickly. The harm it caused did not. This one fact changed how experts think about long-term follow-up after radiation events.

Cleanup workers

A second group studied here is the people who worked on cleanup in the years after the accident. Studies of this group found a higher risk of leukemia — a cancer of the blood-forming tissue. That is a different pattern from the thyroid cancers seen in exposed children.

Different exposures, different ages, different cancers. Radiation does not cause just one kind of harm.

The reassuring finding

Fear that radiation could damage future generations is common and long-standing. Some animal studies have shown effects passed down to offspring, so this fear was not baseless.

But a genomic study of children born to people exposed at Chernobyl found no increase in new genetic changes in those children.

That is a clear, reassuring answer to a question that mattered enormously to many families.

What genomics added

More recent work looked at the tumors themselves. A 2021 study found that thyroid tumors in children exposed to the accident's fallout had more of a certain kind of DNA damage than tumors in people who were not exposed. This damage involved breaks in both strands of the DNA.

This finding makes the mechanism visible. Radiation physically damages DNA, and here, that damage could still be read in tumors decades later.

The practical lesson

Potassium iodide is the tool that comes out of all this research. Authorities may tell people at risk to take it after a radiation release, to stop I-131 from building up in the thyroid. It works by filling the gland with ordinary iodine, leaving no room for the radioactive kind. NCI also notes it should not pose a danger to someone who has already had radiation therapy or chemotherapy.

The bigger lesson is about who needs protecting most, and how fast. Children's thyroids took the brunt of the harm. The window to prevent uptake is short, but the effects can last for decades. That combination is why emergency plans near nuclear facilities are built the way they are.

Why the follow-up still continues

Research on this population has now run for four decades, and it is still producing new findings — the genomic work above is recent. That is one of the lessons on its own.

Health effects that take thirty years to fully show up cannot be measured by a study that stops after ten. Long-running studies are expensive and slow, but they are the only way questions like these ever get answered.

Young woman in black activewear sits on a mat on grass drinking water after exercising outdoors.

Common questions

Why the thyroid in particular?

Radioactive iodine collects in thyroid tissue, because that is the organ that uses iodine. NCI explains that exposure to radioactive iodine may increase thyroid cancer risk for many years, especially in children and adolescents.

I-131 decays quickly. Why does the risk last decades?

That is one of the more striking findings. Despite I-131 having a half-life of about 8 days, the raised thyroid cancer risk remained high for at least 30 years in the NCI-led study.

What is potassium iodide for?

Authorities may advise people to take potassium iodide to prevent I-131 accumulating in the thyroid. NCI notes it should not pose a danger to someone who previously received radiation therapy or chemotherapy.

Were the children of exposed parents affected?

Transgenerational effects have been seen in some animal studies, but genomic analysis of children born to people exposed at Chernobyl indicates the exposure did not lead to an increase in new genetic changes in those children.

Questions to ask your doctor

Being prepared helps you get the most out of your appointments. Save or print these questions.

Open my question list

Tap a question to save it to your list (kept on this device).

Your next step

Turn this topic into questions for your next appointment.

Build a question list
Talk to a person

Talk with a trained specialist or navigator

Cancer Explained provides educational guidance, but does not replace trained specialists, social workers, or your medical team.

Free & Confidential

Talk to a trained cancer information specialist

Free, confidential assistance from NCI Cancer Information Service via phone, chat, or email.

Contact your oncology team

Locate after-hours contact numbers, portal messages, or urgent triage phone lines.

Find a patient navigator

Get one-on-one help with appointments, logistics, translation, and care coordination.

Find a genetic counselor

Discuss inherited mutation risk, family history, and genetic testing options.

Find an oncology social worker

Access emotional counseling, family support groups, and mental health resources.

Find a financial navigator

Locate copay assistance foundations, grant programs, and lodging/travel support.

Find a clinical-trial specialist

Search matching studies and speak with NCI trial information specialists.

Get urgent help

Fever of 100.4°F (38°C) or higher during chemo, severe pain, or trouble breathing: call your cancer care team right away, day or night. Call 911 for an emergency.

Know someone who needs this?

Plenty of people are looking for something like this and do not know where to start. If this would help a friend or someone you love, send it on — we have written an opening line so you do not have to stare at an empty message. You can change every word of it.

Email itText itWhatsApp

Your message is written and sent in your own email or messaging app — we never see who you send it to, and nothing is added to any list.

Prepared by Cancer Explained's AI-assisted editorial system

Written from National Cancer Institute material and compared with the source cited below.

Plain-language explanation of the published sources cited on this page. AI-assisted, source-checked, not clinician-reviewed.

Sources last checked: 2026-08-11 what this meansLast updated: 2026-08-11Next planned review: 2027-08-11

Review details and limits

Cancer Explained does not originate medical claims. Every page restates guidance already published by the National Cancer Institute, the CDC, the USPSTF and the FDA, in plain language, with the source cited so you can check the original yourself. AI does the translating and organizing; automated checks test claims, citations, clarity and safety before anything publishes, and this is translation and navigation, not clinical judgment. Nothing here is personal medical advice, and no page can account for your particular situation.

Editorial status — Source checked. This page was written with AI assistance and then compared with the sources listed on it, looking for statements those sources do not back up. That check is not a sentence-by-sentence record and can miss errors. It is not a medical review, and it does not confirm the page is complete or right for your situation.

General education — varies by person. Answers genuinely differ between people. This page explains what commonly varies and points you to your care team for your situation.

Human medical review: not completed. Pages here are not signed off by a clinician before they publish. That is not an oversight we are quietly working around: we restate published guidance and cite it, so the authority belongs to the source rather than to us, and every page names where its claims come from — you can verify us instead of trusting us. Where a volunteer clinician has reviewed a page, their name and credentials appear on it; where no name appears, no clinician has checked it. We are glad to have reviewers and are recruiting them, and we do not hold pages back waiting for one. Use this site to understand your situation and to ask better questions of the people treating you.

Our editorial processHow we use AIReport an error

More on this topic

Words to know

Tap any term to see what it means.

Browse the full glossary →

How this page was created

Cancer Explained does not originate medical claims. Every page restates guidance already published by the National Cancer Institute, the CDC, the USPSTF and the FDA, in plain language, with the source cited so you can check the original yourself. AI does the translating and organizing; automated checks test claims, citations, clarity and safety before anything publishes, and this is translation and navigation, not clinical judgment. Nothing here is personal medical advice, and no page can account for your particular situation.

Editorial status: Source checked — This page was written with AI assistance and then compared with the sources listed on it, looking for statements those sources do not back up. That check is not a sentence-by-sentence record and can miss errors. It is not a medical review, and it does not confirm the page is complete or right for your situation.

Human medical review: not completed. Pages here are not signed off by a clinician before they publish. That is not an oversight we are quietly working around: we restate published guidance and cite it, so the authority belongs to the source rather than to us, and every page names where its claims come from — you can verify us instead of trusting us. Where a volunteer clinician has reviewed a page, their name and credentials appear on it; where no name appears, no clinician has checked it. We are glad to have reviewers and are recruiting them, and we do not hold pages back waiting for one. Use this site to understand your situation and to ask better questions of the people treating you.

Read more about our editorial process, our use of AI, and our corrections policy.

Spotted a problem? Report an error — a factual mistake, broken or outdated source, confusing wording, or anything that seems unsafe. Please do not include names, medical record numbers, dates of birth, addresses, or other identifying medical information in your report.

After using this page, do you understand what to do next?

Anonymous — we only record the answer, never who gave it.