The short answer
IHC measures how much HER2 protein sits on cancer cells and reports it as 0, 1+, 2+ or 3+. A 2+ result is borderline, meaning the answer is not clear from that test. MedlinePlus explains a different type of HER2 test may then be needed.
HER2 is a protein involved in normal cell growth; some cancers make larger than normal amounts of it.
IHC measures the amount of HER2 protein on the surface of cancer cells.
FISH checks for extra copies of the HER2 gene instead.
MedlinePlus reports 0 or 1+ as HER2 negative and 3+ as HER2 positive.
On this page
Choose how you want to read this
The whole article, with every detail and caution.
This page is for people whose pathology report includes a HER2 IHC score. It explains what HER2 is, what each score means, and what happens after a borderline 2+ result.
What HER2 is doing there in the first place
HER2 stands for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. MedlinePlus describes it as a protein involved in normal cell growth — meaning healthy cells have it too, and it is not a cancer protein by nature.
The problem is quantity. Some types of cancer cells make larger than normal amounts of HER2, including certain cancers of the breast, stomach and esophagus. MedlinePlus notes that cancers with elevated HER2 tend to grow quickly and spread, but that targeted therapy can block these proteins to help control the disease.
That is the reason anyone measures it. The number is there to decide whether a particular class of drug belongs in your plan.
Two different tests, two different questions
There are two main ways to check HER2, and they do not measure the same thing.
- IHC, or immunohistochemistry, measures the amount of HER2 protein on cancer cell surfaces.
- FISH, or fluorescence in situ hybridization, checks for extra copies of the HER2 gene in cancer cells.
One counts protein on the outside of the cell. The other counts gene copies inside it.
MedlinePlus explains the order and the reason for it: for some cancers, an IHC test is often done first because it is faster and less expensive.
Reading the IHC scale
IHC results come back as 0, 1+, 2+ or 3+. MedlinePlus sets out what each end means.
0 or 1+ — the result is called HER2 negative.
3+ — the cancer cells have high levels of HER2 protein, and the result is called HER2 positive.
2+ — the amount of HER2 protein is borderline, and the test result is not clear. MedlinePlus adds that you may need to have a different type of HER2 tumor marker test.
A 2+ is not a middling diagnosis. It is an unfinished sentence.
What follows a 2+
The point of the follow-up test is to break the tie by asking the gene question instead of the protein question.
The follow-up test needs tissue. Whether it uses your existing sample or a new one is something to ask your team, since MedlinePlus notes a new sample may be recommended in some situations, such as metastatic or recurrent cancer.
The wait is the hard part. You have already had one round of uncertainty and now there is another. It is reasonable to ask how long the second test takes and whether anything in your treatment plan is on hold while it runs.
What the answer changes
If the follow-up confirms HER2 positive, ask your team whether HER2 targeted therapy fits your plan.
If it comes back negative, ask your team what other treatment options apply. That is not a dead end — the plan is built around something other than HER2.
Either way, the value of resolving a 2+ is that it removes a guess from your treatment decisions. Nobody wants to give or withhold a drug on the basis of a borderline stain.
A note on reading your own report
Pathology reports are written for clinicians, and HER2 sections are especially dense — scores, staining percentages, ratios, assay names. If you are looking at yours before your appointment, you do not have to decode it alone.
Write down the exact wording that confused you and bring it with you. "My report says 2+, what does that mean for me?" is a completely standard question, and the answer should be specific to your sample, your cancer type and what test is happening next.

Common questions
Is a 2+ result bad news?
It is not a result at all in the sense of being an answer. MedlinePlus describes 2+ as borderline and says the test result is not clear, which is why a different type of HER2 test usually follows.
Why do they start with the protein test?
MedlinePlus explains that for some cancers an IHC protein test is often done first because it is faster and less expensive. A different test, such as FISH, may follow when the result is not clear.
Will I need another biopsy?
Not necessarily. MedlinePlus notes a new sample may be recommended in some situations, such as metastatic or recurrent cancer. Ask your team whether the follow-up uses your existing sample or a new one.
What happens if the second test says negative?
A HER2 negative result means the cancer does not have high HER2 levels. Ask your team which other treatment options apply to you.
Questions to ask your doctor
Being prepared helps you get the most out of your appointments. Save or print these questions.
Tap a question to save it to your list (kept on this device).
Your next step
Turn this topic into questions for your next appointment.
Talk with a trained specialist or navigator
Cancer Explained provides educational guidance, but does not replace trained specialists, social workers, or your medical team.
Talk to a trained cancer information specialist
Free, confidential assistance from NCI Cancer Information Service via phone, chat, or email.
Contact your oncology team
Locate after-hours contact numbers, portal messages, or urgent triage phone lines.
Find a patient navigator
Get one-on-one help with appointments, logistics, translation, and care coordination.
Find a genetic counselor
Discuss inherited mutation risk, family history, and genetic testing options.
Find an oncology social worker
Access emotional counseling, family support groups, and mental health resources.
Find a financial navigator
Locate copay assistance foundations, grant programs, and lodging/travel support.
Find a clinical-trial specialist
Search matching studies and speak with NCI trial information specialists.
Get urgent help
Fever of 100.4°F (38°C) or higher during chemo, severe pain, or trouble breathing: call your cancer care team right away, day or night. Call 911 for an emergency.
Know someone who needs this?
Plenty of people are looking for something like this and do not know where to start. If this would help a friend or someone you love, send it on — we have written an opening line so you do not have to stare at an empty message. You can change every word of it.
Your message is written and sent in your own email or messaging app — we never see who you send it to, and nothing is added to any list.
Plain-language explanation of the published sources cited on this page. AI-assisted, source-checked, not clinician-reviewed.
Sources last checked: 2026-10-02 what this meansLast updated: 2026-08-11Next planned review: 2027-08-11
Review details and limits
Cancer Explained does not originate medical claims. Every page restates guidance already published by the National Cancer Institute, the CDC, the USPSTF and the FDA, in plain language, with the source cited so you can check the original yourself. AI does the translating and organizing; automated checks test claims, citations, clarity and safety before anything publishes, and this is translation and navigation, not clinical judgment. Nothing here is personal medical advice, and no page can account for your particular situation.
Editorial status — Source checked. This page was written with AI assistance and then compared with the sources listed on it, looking for statements those sources do not back up. That check is not a sentence-by-sentence record and can miss errors. It is not a medical review, and it does not confirm the page is complete or right for your situation.
General education — varies by person. Answers genuinely differ between people. This page explains what commonly varies and points you to your care team for your situation.
Human medical review: not completed. Pages here are not signed off by a clinician before they publish. That is not an oversight we are quietly working around: we restate published guidance and cite it, so the authority belongs to the source rather than to us, and every page names where its claims come from — you can verify us instead of trusting us. Where a volunteer clinician has reviewed a page, their name and credentials appear on it; where no name appears, no clinician has checked it. We are glad to have reviewers and are recruiting them, and we do not hold pages back waiting for one. Use this site to understand your situation and to ask better questions of the people treating you.
Words to know
Tap any term to see what it means.
How this page was created
Cancer Explained does not originate medical claims. Every page restates guidance already published by the National Cancer Institute, the CDC, the USPSTF and the FDA, in plain language, with the source cited so you can check the original yourself. AI does the translating and organizing; automated checks test claims, citations, clarity and safety before anything publishes, and this is translation and navigation, not clinical judgment. Nothing here is personal medical advice, and no page can account for your particular situation.
Editorial status: Source checked — This page was written with AI assistance and then compared with the sources listed on it, looking for statements those sources do not back up. That check is not a sentence-by-sentence record and can miss errors. It is not a medical review, and it does not confirm the page is complete or right for your situation.
Human medical review: not completed. Pages here are not signed off by a clinician before they publish. That is not an oversight we are quietly working around: we restate published guidance and cite it, so the authority belongs to the source rather than to us, and every page names where its claims come from — you can verify us instead of trusting us. Where a volunteer clinician has reviewed a page, their name and credentials appear on it; where no name appears, no clinician has checked it. We are glad to have reviewers and are recruiting them, and we do not hold pages back waiting for one. Use this site to understand your situation and to ask better questions of the people treating you.
Read more about our editorial process, our use of AI, and our corrections policy.
Spotted a problem? Report an error — a factual mistake, broken or outdated source, confusing wording, or anything that seems unsafe. Please do not include names, medical record numbers, dates of birth, addresses, or other identifying medical information in your report.
After using this page, do you understand what to do next?
Anonymous — we only record the answer, never who gave it.
