Skip to main content
Also available in 3 other languages

РусскийTiếng Việt简体中文

Beginner 5 min read

Contaminated water at military bases and cancer risk

Researchers compared cancer rates at Camp Lejeune, where water was contaminated for decades, with a similar base. Several cancers were more common.

Source:ATSDR — Camp Lejeune Cancer Incidence Study

Review status: AI-assisted, source checked. Not reviewed by a clinician. How we check pages

The short answer

Drinking water at Camp Lejeune was contaminated from the early 1950s until the most contaminated wells were shut down in 1985. A federal study compared about 154,821 people there with about 163,484 at Camp Pendleton and found increased risk of several cancers in the exposed group. The chemicals involved were TCE, PCE, benzene and vinyl chloride.

  • Contamination of drinking water at Camp Lejeune began in the early 1950s; the most contaminated wells were shut down in 1985.

  • Four contaminants were studied: TCE, PCE, benzene and vinyl chloride.

  • The cancer incidence study compared 154,821 people at Camp Lejeune with 163,484 at Camp Pendleton.

  • Among Marines and Navy personnel, increased risk was seen for leukemia and lymphoma and for cancers of the lung, breast, larynx, esophagus, thyroid and soft tissues.

Choose how you want to read this

The whole article, with every detail and caution.

What was in the water, and for how long

This page is for people who lived or worked at Camp Lejeune, and their families. It explains what the large federal study of the base's water found about cancer.

At Camp Lejeune in North Carolina, the drinking water was contaminated with industrial chemicals. The federal Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) says this began in the early 1950s. The most contaminated wells were shut down in 1985. That is roughly three decades. During those years people trained there, worked there, raised families there and drank the tap water.

Four contaminants sit at the center of the research. ATSDR says the water at one treatment plant (Hadnot Point) was contaminated mainly by TCE (trichloroethylene). At another (Tarawa Terrace) it was mainly PCE (tetrachloroethylene), from an off-base dry cleaner. Benzene and vinyl chloride were also present.

How the study was built

The strongest thing about this research is how it was set up.

Researchers took 154,821 people from Camp Lejeune and 163,484 from Camp Pendleton in California. All were present between the mid-1970s and the mid-1980s. Camp Pendleton served as the comparison. It was a large military population living a broadly similar life, but without the contaminated water.

That structure matters. Military populations share a lot, such as job hazards, medical care and age range. Comparing one base with another, instead of with the general public, helps account for that shared background.

ATSDR calls it one of the largest studies of its type done in the United States. The team used cancer registry data from all 50 states, plus several federal databases. ATSDR says outside experts reviewed it before it was published in Environmental Health Perspectives.

What was found

Among Marines and Navy personnel at Camp Lejeune, researchers saw increased risk for leukemia and lymphoma. They also saw it for cancers of the lung, breast, larynx, esophagus, thyroid and soft tissues.

Among civilian workers at the base, the increases showed up for myeloid cancers (cancers of certain blood-forming cells) and for some cancers of the breast and lung.

ATSDR sums the whole exercise up this way. Increased risk of several cancers was observed among Marines and civilian workers exposed to the contaminated drinking water, compared with the unexposed group at Camp Pendleton.

What a finding like this can and cannot tell you

A study of hundreds of thousands of people measures rates in groups. It cannot reach back and explain one person's diagnosis.

This is not a technicality, and it is not a brush-off. Someone who served at the base and later got a cancer on that list is understandably sure of the connection. But statistics do not work at the level of one person. They say how often something happened across a population, and then they stop.

What the evidence does support is treating the exposure as a documented public health event. Federal agencies now do exactly that.

Practical steps if this is your history

Pin down your dates. Which years you were there, and in what role, is the single most useful fact you can nail down. Old records are easier to find now than later.

Get it written into your medical record. A doctor seeing you for the first time in ten years will not know unless it is in the chart.

Ask the VA directly about care tied to this exposure. Do not piece it together from forums. Benefit and eligibility rules are administrative questions with real answers, and the people who run them are the right source.

Keep any routine screening you are due for on schedule. Nothing here replaces the ordinary checks for your age. This is a reason to keep them, not to swap them for something else.

For families, not just service members

Families lived on base too. ATSDR says the exposure affected residents, including infants and children, as well as civilian workers, Marines and Navy personnel. The cancer study described here covered Marines, Navy personnel and civilian workers.

So the exposure history is worth passing around a family. That goes double for adult children who were there young and remember none of it. A fact nobody mentions cannot end up in anyone's medical record. This one is worth mentioning.

A stemmed glass of clear water on a cloth-covered table with light and shadow.
A glass of water on a table

Common questions

Why compare two different bases?

Camp Pendleton served as an unexposed comparison group. Comparing two large military populations of similar make-up is how researchers separate the effect of the water from everything else people at a base have in common.

Does this mean my cancer was caused by the water?

A study like this describes rates across very large groups. It cannot establish the cause of any one person's cancer, and no honest source will tell you otherwise.

How big was this study?

ATSDR describes it as one of the largest studies of this type conducted in the United States, using cancer registry data across all 50 states along with several federal databases, and externally peer reviewed.

Which chemicals were in the water?

ATSDR's research summary names four volatile organic compounds: TCE, PCE, benzene and vinyl chloride.

Questions to ask your doctor

Being prepared helps you get the most out of your appointments. Save or print these questions.

Open my question list

Tap a question to save it to your list (kept on this device).

Your next step

Turn this topic into questions for your next appointment.

Build a question list
Talk to a person

Talk with a trained specialist or navigator

Cancer Explained provides educational guidance, but does not replace trained specialists, social workers, or your medical team.

Free & Confidential

Talk to a trained cancer information specialist

Free, confidential assistance from NCI Cancer Information Service via phone, chat, or email.

Contact your oncology team

Locate after-hours contact numbers, portal messages, or urgent triage phone lines.

Find a patient navigator

Get one-on-one help with appointments, logistics, translation, and care coordination.

Find a genetic counselor

Discuss inherited mutation risk, family history, and genetic testing options.

Find an oncology social worker

Access emotional counseling, family support groups, and mental health resources.

Find a financial navigator

Locate copay assistance foundations, grant programs, and lodging/travel support.

Find a clinical-trial specialist

Search matching studies and speak with NCI trial information specialists.

Get urgent help

Fever of 100.4°F (38°C) or higher during chemo, severe pain, or trouble breathing: call your cancer care team right away, day or night. Call 911 for an emergency.

Know someone who needs this?

Plenty of people are looking for something like this and do not know where to start. If this would help a friend or someone you love, send it on — we have written an opening line so you do not have to stare at an empty message. You can change every word of it.

Email itText itWhatsApp

Your message is written and sent in your own email or messaging app — we never see who you send it to, and nothing is added to any list.

Prepared by Cancer Explained's AI-assisted editorial system

Written from federal health agency material and compared with the source cited below.

Plain-language explanation of the published sources cited on this page. AI-assisted, source-checked, not clinician-reviewed.

Sources last checked: 2026-08-11 what this meansLast updated: 2026-10-02Next planned review: 2027-08-11

Review details and limits

Cancer Explained does not originate medical claims. Every page restates guidance already published by the National Cancer Institute, the CDC, the USPSTF and the FDA, in plain language, with the source cited so you can check the original yourself. AI does the translating and organizing; automated checks test claims, citations, clarity and safety before anything publishes, and this is translation and navigation, not clinical judgment. Nothing here is personal medical advice, and no page can account for your particular situation.

Editorial status — Source checked. This page was written with AI assistance and then compared with the sources listed on it, looking for statements those sources do not back up. That check is not a sentence-by-sentence record and can miss errors. It is not a medical review, and it does not confirm the page is complete or right for your situation.

General education — varies by person. Answers genuinely differ between people. This page explains what commonly varies and points you to your care team for your situation.

Human medical review: not completed. Pages here are not signed off by a clinician before they publish. That is not an oversight we are quietly working around: we restate published guidance and cite it, so the authority belongs to the source rather than to us, and every page names where its claims come from — you can verify us instead of trusting us. Where a volunteer clinician has reviewed a page, their name and credentials appear on it; where no name appears, no clinician has checked it. We are glad to have reviewers and are recruiting them, and we do not hold pages back waiting for one. Use this site to understand your situation and to ask better questions of the people treating you.

Our editorial processHow we use AIReport an error

More on this topic

Words to know

Tap any term to see what it means.

Browse the full glossary →

How this page was created

Cancer Explained does not originate medical claims. Every page restates guidance already published by the National Cancer Institute, the CDC, the USPSTF and the FDA, in plain language, with the source cited so you can check the original yourself. AI does the translating and organizing; automated checks test claims, citations, clarity and safety before anything publishes, and this is translation and navigation, not clinical judgment. Nothing here is personal medical advice, and no page can account for your particular situation.

Editorial status: Source checked — This page was written with AI assistance and then compared with the sources listed on it, looking for statements those sources do not back up. That check is not a sentence-by-sentence record and can miss errors. It is not a medical review, and it does not confirm the page is complete or right for your situation.

Human medical review: not completed. Pages here are not signed off by a clinician before they publish. That is not an oversight we are quietly working around: we restate published guidance and cite it, so the authority belongs to the source rather than to us, and every page names where its claims come from — you can verify us instead of trusting us. Where a volunteer clinician has reviewed a page, their name and credentials appear on it; where no name appears, no clinician has checked it. We are glad to have reviewers and are recruiting them, and we do not hold pages back waiting for one. Use this site to understand your situation and to ask better questions of the people treating you.

Read more about our editorial process, our use of AI, and our corrections policy.

Spotted a problem? Report an error — a factual mistake, broken or outdated source, confusing wording, or anything that seems unsafe. Please do not include names, medical record numbers, dates of birth, addresses, or other identifying medical information in your report.

After using this page, do you understand what to do next?

Anonymous — we only record the answer, never who gave it.