The short answer
Waldenström macroglobulinemia is lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma with an IgM paraprotein. Most patients carry a MYD88 variant, and NCI's PDQ summary says patients should be checked for hepatitis C. A serum viscosity above four signals hyperviscosity, and asymptomatic patients can be monitored rather than treated.
Waldenström macroglobulinemia and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma are the same disease; NCI's PDQ summary treats them under one heading, linked by a monoclonal IgM paraprotein.
Most patients carry a MYD88 variant, which PDQ says some pathologists consider indicative of the disease. PDQ also says patients should be checked for hepatitis C virus infection.
PDQ states that asymptomatic patients can be monitored for progression without immediate chemotherapy, and names age 70 or older, beta-2-microglobulin of 3 mg/dL or more, and raised LDH as factors linked to symptoms requiring therapy.
A serum viscosity greater than four relative to water can produce hyperviscosity symptoms, where PDQ says plasmapheresis is useful for retinopathy, congestive heart failure, and CNS dysfunction.
Choose how you want to understand this
The full explanation.
Two names for one disease
Waldenström macroglobulinemia is the same disease as lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. NCI's PDQ summary on adult non-Hodgkin lymphoma treats them under one heading.
The link between the two names is a protein. PDQ says lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma usually comes with a monoclonal serum paraprotein of the IgM type. That combination is what earns the name Waldenström macroglobulinemia. A paraprotein is an abnormal antibody, made in bulk by one clone of cells.
PDQ describes where the disease sits. Most patients have it in the bone marrow, the lymph nodes, and the spleen. Some develop hyperviscosity syndrome. That means the blood grows too thick to flow well.
The genetic marker, and two tests that are easy to miss
Most patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia carry a variant in the MYD88 gene. PDQ notes that some pathologists consider it indicative of the disease.
PDQ also flags a caution that matters at diagnosis. Other lymphomas can be associated with serum paraproteins too, so an IgM protein alone does not settle the question.
And it names one test that is easy to overlook. PDQ says patients with lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma should be checked for hepatitis C virus infection.
Waiting is a real option
PDQ states that patients without symptoms can be monitored for evidence of disease progression, without immediate need for chemotherapy. That is not a delay in care. It is the recommended approach for that group.
PDQ lists three factors associated with symptoms that require therapy.
- Age 70 years or older.
- Beta-2-microglobulin of 3 mg/dL or more.
- Increased serum LDH, meaning lactate dehydrogenase.
A separate prognostic model, which PDQ describes as externally validated, uses age, albumin, and LDH.
The viscosity number that changes the plan
This is one of the few places in lymphoma care where a single lab value routes the treatment.
PDQ says serum viscosity is measured against water. Above four, a patient may have symptoms of hyperviscosity. Plasmapheresis is useful there for sudden, short-term symptoms. PDQ names three: retinopathy, congestive heart failure, and central nervous system trouble. Plasmapheresis filters the plasma to strip out the excess protein. PDQ says it can also be paired with chemo for longer control.
Because those symptoms come on as emergencies, it is worth knowing them before they happen. Call 911 if you have sudden blurred or lost vision, confusion, slurred speech, weakness on one side, a seizure, or severe shortness of breath. Nosebleeds or bleeding gums that will not stop are also a reason to call your team the same day. Hyperviscosity is treated urgently, and plasmapheresis works quickly once it is started.
What about symptomatic patients whose viscosity is four or lower? PDQ says the usual approach is chemoimmunotherapy, or biologically directed therapy.
Why rituximab is watched closely at the start
PDQ reports response rates of 60% to 80% in untreated patients given rituximab. But it attaches a warning to that number.
Serum IgM has to be watched closely. The paraprotein can rise suddenly at the start of therapy. PDQ says that rise can be avoided in two ways. One is an alkylating agent at the same time, such as cyclophosphamide. The other is a proteasome inhibitor, such as bortezomib or ixazomib. PDQ notes that bortezomib, dexamethasone, and rituximab together have been used without that rebound.
That detail explains something confusing. A rising IgM number soon after starting rituximab is not automatically a sign that treatment is failing.
What the two BTK inhibitor trials showed
PDQ lists several first-line options. Zanubrutinib with rituximab. Ibrutinib with rituximab. Rituximab alone. Nucleoside analogues. And alkylating agents, alone or in a combination. Zanubrutinib and ibrutinib are BTK inhibitors. BTK is short for Bruton tyrosine kinase.
Two randomized trials give the numbers.
The first enrolled 150 symptomatic patients. Some were untreated, some were relapsing. One arm got ibrutinib with rituximab. The other got rituximab with a placebo. At a median follow-up of 50 months, the 4.5-year PFS rate was 68% in the ibrutinib arm. It was 25% in the placebo arm. The hazard ratio was 0.25, with a P value below .0001. Overall survival at 30 months was no different, at 92% to 94%. PDQ grades this Level of evidence B1.
The second compared zanubrutinib with ibrutinib. It enrolled 164 patients with relapsed disease and 38 who were untreated. At a median follow-up of 44.4 months, PFS was similar in both, at 70% to 78%. Overall survival was similar too, at 85% to 87%. The difference was in side effects. The zanubrutinib group had fewer cases of atrial fibrillation, 1 against 11. It also had 50% fewer cases of high blood pressure. PDQ grades this Level of evidence C3.
Read together, those trials say something practical. The choice between the two BTK inhibitors turns on heart and blood pressure effects. It does not turn on how well they control the lymphoma.
Cold agglutinin disease and Bing-Neel syndrome
Two complications get their own treatment paths in PDQ.
Cold agglutinin disease is antibody-driven destruction of red blood cells, set off by cold. PDQ says rituximab, bendamustine, and steroids are often used. It notes that a heated room is sometimes needed. That is for patients whose cold agglutinins switch on with even minor chilling. Sometimes lymphoma-directed treatment does not work. PDQ says sutimlimab can reduce red cell destruction in that case. It is an IgG4 antibody that blocks part of the complement pathway.
PDQ also reports a small series on ibrutinib. All 13 patients reached clinical remission, whatever their MYD88 status. They had cold-antibody hemolytic anemia with acrocyanosis. Acrocyanosis is a bluish color of the hands and feet.
Bing-Neel syndrome is the rare case where the lymphoma involves the central nervous system. PDQ reports an 85% response rate with ibrutinib in an anecdotal series of 28 patients, graded Level of evidence C3.
A drug choice that closes a door later
PDQ makes one point about sequencing that is worth raising early.
Myeloablative therapy with stem cell support is still under study. That covers both autologous and donor cells. PDQ says candidates for it should avoid long-term alkylating agents. The same goes for purine nucleoside analogues. The reason is specific. Those drugs can deplete blood-forming stem cells. They can also raise the risk of myelodysplasia or acute leukemia.
PDQ also reports a trial in patients who relapsed after an alkylating agent. It assigned 92 patients at random. One arm got fludarabine. The other got cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone. Relapse-free survival favored fludarabine, with a median of 19 months against 3 months. Overall survival showed no difference.
Where to read next
The wider family here is described in lymphoma. Test details are covered in diagnosis questions. Drug choices are covered in treatment questions.
Sources
Words to know
Tap any term to see what it means.

Common questions
What is Waldenström macroglobulinemia?
NCI's PDQ summary on adult non-Hodgkin lymphoma treats Waldenström macroglobulinemia and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma as one entity. PDQ says lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma is usually associated with a monoclonal serum paraprotein of the IgM type, and that combination carries the Waldenström name. Most patients have bone marrow, lymph node, and splenic involvement, and some develop hyperviscosity syndrome.
What tests should be part of the workup?
PDQ notes that most patients carry a MYD88 variant, which some pathologists consider indicative of the disease. It cautions that other lymphomas can also be associated with serum paraproteins, so an IgM protein alone does not settle the diagnosis. PDQ also states that patients with lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma should be checked for hepatitis C virus infection.
Does treatment always start right away?
No. PDQ states that asymptomatic patients can be monitored for evidence of disease progression without immediate need for chemotherapy. It lists three factors associated with symptoms requiring therapy: age 70 or older, beta-2-microglobulin of 3 mg/dL or more, and increased serum LDH. A separate externally validated model uses age, albumin, and LDH.
What does serum viscosity change?
It changes the immediate plan. PDQ says that if serum viscosity relative to water is greater than four, a patient may have hyperviscosity symptoms, and plasmapheresis is useful for acute problems such as retinopathy, congestive heart failure, and central nervous system dysfunction. It can also be combined with chemotherapy. For symptomatic patients with a viscosity of four or lower, PDQ describes chemoimmunotherapy or biologically directed therapy as usual.
Why does IgM sometimes rise after rituximab starts?
PDQ reports response rates of 60% to 80% with rituximab in previously untreated patients, but warns that close monitoring of serum IgM is required because of a sudden rise in the paraprotein at the start of therapy. It says this rise can be avoided with a concomitant alkylating agent such as cyclophosphamide, or a proteasome inhibitor such as bortezomib or ixazomib, and that bortezomib with dexamethasone and rituximab has been used without causing rebound.
Questions to ask your doctor
Being prepared helps you get the most out of your appointments. Save or print these questions.
Tap a question to save it to your list (kept on this device).
Your next step
Turn this guide into a short list for your care team.
Speak With Trained Specialists & Human Navigators
Cancer Explained provides educational guidance, but does not replace trained specialists, social workers, or your medical team.
Talk to a trained cancer information specialist
Free, confidential assistance from NCI Cancer Information Service via phone, chat, or email.
Contact your oncology team
Locate after-hours contact numbers, portal messages, or urgent triage phone lines.
Find a patient navigator
Get one-on-one help with appointments, logistics, translation, and care coordination.
Find a genetic counselor
Discuss inherited mutation risk, family history, and genetic testing options.
Find an oncology social worker
Access emotional counseling, family support groups, and mental health resources.
Find a financial navigator
Locate copay assistance foundations, grant programs, and lodging/travel support.
Find a clinical-trial specialist
Search matching studies and speak with NCI trial information specialists.
Get urgent help
Immediate emergency guidance for fever (>100.4°F during chemo), severe pain, or shortness of breath.
Help Us Improve This Guide
Did this explanation answer your question and help you determine your next step?
Know someone who needs this?
Plenty of people are looking for something like this and do not know where to start. If this would help a friend or someone you love, send it on — we have written an opening line so you do not have to stare at an empty message. You can change every word of it.
Your message is written and sent in your own email or messaging app — we never see who you send it to, and nothing is added to any list.
Plain-language explanation of the published sources cited on this page. AI-assisted, source-checked, not clinician-reviewed.
Sources last checked: 2026-08-06 what this meansLast updated: 2026-08-17Next planned review: 2027-07-22
How this page was created
Cancer Explained does not originate medical claims. Every page restates guidance already published by the National Cancer Institute, the CDC, the USPSTF and the FDA, in plain language, with the source cited so you can check the original yourself. AI does the translating and organizing; automated checks test claims, citations, clarity and safety before anything publishes. We do not employ clinicians and do not intend to — our work is translation and navigation, not clinical judgment. Nothing here is personal medical advice, and no page can account for your particular situation.
Editorial status — Source checked. This page was written with AI assistance and checked line by line against the sources listed on it. That confirms the sources support what the page says. It is not a medical review, and it does not confirm the page is complete or right for your situation.
General education — varies by person. Answers genuinely differ between people. This page explains what commonly varies and points you to your care team for your situation.
Human medical review: not completed. Pages here are not signed off by a clinician before they publish. That is not an oversight we are quietly working around: we restate published guidance and cite it, so the authority belongs to the source rather than to us, and every page names where its claims come from — you can verify us instead of trusting us. Where a volunteer clinician has reviewed a page, their name and credentials appear on it; where no name appears, no clinician has checked it. We are glad to have reviewers and are recruiting them, and we do not hold pages back waiting for one. Use this site to understand your situation and to ask better questions of the people treating you.
How this page was created
Cancer Explained does not originate medical claims. Every page restates guidance already published by the National Cancer Institute, the CDC, the USPSTF and the FDA, in plain language, with the source cited so you can check the original yourself. AI does the translating and organizing; automated checks test claims, citations, clarity and safety before anything publishes. We do not employ clinicians and do not intend to — our work is translation and navigation, not clinical judgment. Nothing here is personal medical advice, and no page can account for your particular situation.
Editorial status: Source checked — This page was written with AI assistance and checked line by line against the sources listed on it. That confirms the sources support what the page says. It is not a medical review, and it does not confirm the page is complete or right for your situation.
Human medical review: not completed. Pages here are not signed off by a clinician before they publish. That is not an oversight we are quietly working around: we restate published guidance and cite it, so the authority belongs to the source rather than to us, and every page names where its claims come from — you can verify us instead of trusting us. Where a volunteer clinician has reviewed a page, their name and credentials appear on it; where no name appears, no clinician has checked it. We are glad to have reviewers and are recruiting them, and we do not hold pages back waiting for one. Use this site to understand your situation and to ask better questions of the people treating you.
Read more about our editorial process, our use of AI, and our corrections policy.
Spotted a problem? Report an error — a factual mistake, broken or outdated source, confusing wording, or anything that seems unsafe. Please do not include names, medical record numbers, dates of birth, addresses, or other identifying medical information in your report.
After using this page, do you understand what to do next?
Anonymous — we only record the answer, never who gave it.
Related articles
Still have questions?
Educational answers, plain language
Free to print and share
