Skip to main content
Beginner 5 min read

What Does IHC 0, 1+, 2+, or 3+ Mean?

IHC 0, 1+, 2+, or 3+ can appear in cancer reports or oncology notes. Learn what it can mean, what it cannot tell alone, and what to ask next.

NCI source:NCI PDQ — Breast Cancer Treatment (Health Professional Version)

Review status: AI-assisted, source checked. Not reviewed by a clinician. How we check pages

The short answer

IHC 0, 1+, 2+, or 3+ is a report or oncology term that needs context from the full diagnosis, test method, symptoms, and treatment goal.

  • What Does IHC 0, 1+, 2+, or 3+ Mean? is a planning topic, not a diagnosis or treatment instruction by itself.

  • The next step depends on diagnosis, symptoms, goals, prior results, and what is still pending.

  • Use the page to prepare specific questions for a clinician who can review the full record.

Choose how you want to read this

The whole article, with every detail and caution.

This page is for people whose pathology report shows an IHC score such as 0, 1+, 2+, or 3+. It explains what the score measures, why it means different things for different markers, and what to ask.

What the number is counting

Immunohistochemistry, usually shortened to IHC, is a stain. A pathologist applies an antibody to a slice of your tumor. The antibody sticks to one specific protein and drags a color with it. Under the microscope, the pathologist then judges two things: how dark the color is, and how many tumor cells show it.

The 0, 1+, 2+, 3+ scale is that judgment written down. Zero means no staining. Three plus is the strongest score.

It is a visual grading scale read by a human being. That fact explains most of what follows.

The scale belongs to the marker, not to cancer in general

There is no universal meaning to "2+." The cutoffs are written separately for each protein, in each cancer type, by guideline committees. A 2+ for one marker can be a firm result. For another it means the test has failed to decide.

So the first question about any IHC score is never "is 2+ good or bad." It is "2+ of what, in what cancer."

HER2 in breast cancer: the scale that made this famous

HER2 is a growth-signaling protein on the cell surface. Too much of it drives faster growth, and it is also a drug target.

The National Cancer Institute's clinician summary sets out the ASCO/CAP thresholds:

  • IHC 0 or 1+ — negative
  • IHC 2+ — equivocal, meaning undecided
  • IHC 3+ — positive

Your team uses the result, with other tests, to plan treatment.

A 2+ is not a result. It starts a second test.

This is the most useful thing to know about the scale. NCI states that an equivocal 2+ requires an alternative in situ hybridization test to resolve it. In situ hybridization, or ISH, counts actual copies of the HER2 gene instead of judging stain color.

NCI gives the dual-probe ISH thresholds it uses:

  • Negative — HER2/CEP17 ratio below 2.0 and HER2 copy number below 4
  • Equivocal — ratio below 2.0 and copy number of 4 or more but under 6
  • Positive — ratio of 2.0 or more, or copy number of 6 or more

CEP17 is a reference marker on chromosome 17. The ratio compares HER2 copies against it, which corrects for tumors carrying extra whole chromosomes.

If your report says 2+ and nothing else, the answer is still pending. Ask whether ISH was ordered and when it results.

Why a HER2 1+ can still matter

Older reports often filed IHC 1+ as simply negative. Newer terms such as "HER2-low" are now used for some breast cancers with lower HER2 scores, and some treatments are studied or approved for them. I could not open the FDA approval page for this check, so this page does not give drug names or trial numbers. Ask your team whether your score, and the second test if you had one, affects your treatment options. See HER2-Low Breast Cancer.

Hormone receptors do not use this scale at all

Estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor are also read by IHC, but the answer is a percentage, not a plus sign.

NCI gives one threshold for both. Any staining in 1% of cells or more is considered positive.

So a report reading "ER 90%, PR 5%, HER2 1+" is mixing two different scoring systems in one line. Read each on its own terms.

Mismatch repair proteins are read as present or absent

A third pattern shows up in colorectal, endometrial, and other cancers. Mismatch repair (MMR) proteins are stained, and the result is reported by whether the proteins are expressed, not by a 0 to 3+ grade.

NCI's colorectal cancer genetics summary says tumor evaluation for Lynch syndrome, an inherited condition that raises cancer risk, often begins with IHC for MMR protein expression or microsatellite instability (MSI) testing, BRAF testing, and MLH1 hypermethylation analysis.

That is why a "loss of MLH1" line is not the end of the workup. It is the beginning of one.

Why two labs can score the same tumor differently

IHC is read by a person, and a borderline score is a judgment call. If your result is borderline or does not fit the clinical picture, you can ask:

  • Which antibody clone and scoring guideline the lab used
  • Whether the score came from the biopsy, the surgical specimen, or both
  • Whether a spread site has been tested
  • Whether the slides can be sent for outside review

What to ask about your own score

  • Which protein was stained, and what score did it get?
  • Is that score positive, negative, or equivocal for this specific cancer?
  • If it is equivocal, what confirmatory test was ordered and when is it back?
  • Does this score change which treatments or trials I can consider?
  • Was this tested on the original tumor or on a newer sample?

Follow the marker further

HER2-Low Breast Cancer covers that category in depth. MSI-H Colorectal Cancer and dMMR Endometrial Cancer follow the mismatch repair path. Pathology Reports explains the rest of the document these scores sit in.

Sources

A microscope in the foreground with abstract cell overlays and a blurred laboratory team behind.

Common questions

Does this page tell me what treatment to choose?

No. It explains the topic in plain language so you can ask better questions. Your care team applies it to your diagnosis, test results, and goals.

What should I bring to the visit?

Bring the report, medicine list, recent test results, and a written list of questions. Ask what result or decision is still pending.

When is this more urgent?

Use the urgent instructions from your care team for severe, fast-changing, or treatment-specific warning symptoms.

Questions to ask your doctor

Being prepared helps you get the most out of your appointments. Save or print these questions.

Open my question list

Tap a question to save it to your list (kept on this device).

Your next step

Turn this topic into questions for your next appointment.

Build a question list
Talk to a person

Talk with a trained specialist or navigator

Cancer Explained provides educational guidance, but does not replace trained specialists, social workers, or your medical team.

Free & Confidential

Talk to a trained cancer information specialist

Free, confidential assistance from NCI Cancer Information Service via phone, chat, or email.

Contact your oncology team

Locate after-hours contact numbers, portal messages, or urgent triage phone lines.

Find a patient navigator

Get one-on-one help with appointments, logistics, translation, and care coordination.

Find a genetic counselor

Discuss inherited mutation risk, family history, and genetic testing options.

Find an oncology social worker

Access emotional counseling, family support groups, and mental health resources.

Find a financial navigator

Locate copay assistance foundations, grant programs, and lodging/travel support.

Find a clinical-trial specialist

Search matching studies and speak with NCI trial information specialists.

Get urgent help

Fever of 100.4°F (38°C) or higher during chemo, severe pain, or trouble breathing: call your cancer care team right away, day or night. Call 911 for an emergency.

Know someone who needs this?

Plenty of people are looking for something like this and do not know where to start. If this would help a friend or someone you love, send it on — we have written an opening line so you do not have to stare at an empty message. You can change every word of it.

Email itText itWhatsApp

Your message is written and sent in your own email or messaging app — we never see who you send it to, and nothing is added to any list.

Prepared by Cancer Explained's AI-assisted editorial system

Written from National Cancer Institute material and compared with the source cited below.

Plain-language explanation of the published sources cited on this page. AI-assisted, source-checked, not clinician-reviewed.

Sources last checked: 2026-10-02 what this meansLast updated: 2026-10-02Next planned review: 2027-07-21

Review details and limits

Cancer Explained does not originate medical claims. Every page restates guidance already published by the National Cancer Institute, the CDC, the USPSTF and the FDA, in plain language, with the source cited so you can check the original yourself. AI does the translating and organizing; automated checks test claims, citations, clarity and safety before anything publishes, and this is translation and navigation, not clinical judgment. Nothing here is personal medical advice, and no page can account for your particular situation.

Editorial status — Source checked. This page was written with AI assistance and then compared with the sources listed on it, looking for statements those sources do not back up. That check is not a sentence-by-sentence record and can miss errors. It is not a medical review, and it does not confirm the page is complete or right for your situation.

General education — varies by person. Answers genuinely differ between people. This page explains what commonly varies and points you to your care team for your situation.

Human medical review: not completed. Pages here are not signed off by a clinician before they publish. That is not an oversight we are quietly working around: we restate published guidance and cite it, so the authority belongs to the source rather than to us, and every page names where its claims come from — you can verify us instead of trusting us. Where a volunteer clinician has reviewed a page, their name and credentials appear on it; where no name appears, no clinician has checked it. We are glad to have reviewers and are recruiting them, and we do not hold pages back waiting for one. Use this site to understand your situation and to ask better questions of the people treating you.

Our editorial processHow we use AIReport an error

More on this topic

Words to know

Tap any term to see what it means.

Browse the full glossary →

How this page was created

Cancer Explained does not originate medical claims. Every page restates guidance already published by the National Cancer Institute, the CDC, the USPSTF and the FDA, in plain language, with the source cited so you can check the original yourself. AI does the translating and organizing; automated checks test claims, citations, clarity and safety before anything publishes, and this is translation and navigation, not clinical judgment. Nothing here is personal medical advice, and no page can account for your particular situation.

Editorial status: Source checked — This page was written with AI assistance and then compared with the sources listed on it, looking for statements those sources do not back up. That check is not a sentence-by-sentence record and can miss errors. It is not a medical review, and it does not confirm the page is complete or right for your situation.

Human medical review: not completed. Pages here are not signed off by a clinician before they publish. That is not an oversight we are quietly working around: we restate published guidance and cite it, so the authority belongs to the source rather than to us, and every page names where its claims come from — you can verify us instead of trusting us. Where a volunteer clinician has reviewed a page, their name and credentials appear on it; where no name appears, no clinician has checked it. We are glad to have reviewers and are recruiting them, and we do not hold pages back waiting for one. Use this site to understand your situation and to ask better questions of the people treating you.

Read more about our editorial process, our use of AI, and our corrections policy.

Spotted a problem? Report an error — a factual mistake, broken or outdated source, confusing wording, or anything that seems unsafe. Please do not include names, medical record numbers, dates of birth, addresses, or other identifying medical information in your report.

After using this page, do you understand what to do next?

Anonymous — we only record the answer, never who gave it.