Skip to main content
Cancer Explained
Donate

NewsResearch

PCPT: What the Prostate Cancer Trial Found

The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial gave finasteride to nearly 19,000 healthy men for seven years. It cut the number of cancers found by a quarter — and turned up more high-grade tumours, a finding that stopped the drug's use.

By Cancer Explained Editorial TeamPublished Updated

Original commentary from the Cancer Explained editorial team.

A lab worker views pathology images on monitors beside a microscope and sample vials
A lab worker views pathology images on monitors beside a microscope and sample vials — illustrative photograph, not of anyone named in this story.

Historical context: this page explains an event dated 2003. It was published as an explainer on July 12, 2026 and is not breaking news.

Please note: this page is educational only — it is not medical advice, and it does not speculate about anyone’s health beyond reliable public reporting. For questions about your own health, talk with your healthcare team.

A drug given to men who did not have cancer

Prevention trials are a different animal from treatment trials. Everyone taking part is well. Any side effect is a pure cost, paid by healthy people, against a benefit that may never arrive.

The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial gave 18,882 men a daily tablet for seven years and then looked for cancer. Finasteride blocks the conversion of testosterone into dihydrotestosterone, the main androgen inside the prostate, so the reasoning was straightforward: less of that hormone might mean less cancer.

Who was enrolled, and how cancer was looked for

FieldDetail
TrialProstate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT)
IdentifierNo ClinicalTrials.gov number is given in the published report
DesignRandomised prevention trial
ParticipantsMen aged 55 or older, normal digital rectal exam, PSA of 3.0 ng/mL or lower
ComparatorFinasteride 5 mg a day against placebo, for seven years
Primary endpointHow many men had prostate cancer during the seven years

That is the trial's design, not advice. Whether finasteride suits you, and at what amount, is for your own doctor to judge.

Biopsy was recommended if the annual PSA — adjusted for the fact that finasteride lowers PSA — went above 4.0 ng/mL, or if the rectal exam became abnormal. The designers expected about 60% of participants either to be diagnosed during the study or to have a biopsy at the end of it.

That biopsy rule matters more than anything else in the trial. It is how cancer got found, and it did not work identically in the two groups.

Fewer cancers found

Prostate cancer was detected in 803 of the 4,368 finasteride men with final data (18.4%) and in 1,147 of the 4,692 placebo men (24.4%).

That is a 24.8% relative reduction in prevalence over the seven years (95% CI 18.6% to 30.6%, p<0.001), or about six fewer diagnoses per hundred men.

The high-grade signal

The cancers found in the finasteride group looked worse under the microscope.

Tumours graded Gleason 7 to 10 made up 280 of 757 finasteride tumours (37.0%) and 237 of 1,068 placebo tumours (22.2%), p<0.001. Counted across all the men rather than all the tumours, that is 6.4% of the finasteride group and 5.1% of the placebo group, p=0.005.

There are two ways to read that. One is that the drug pushes remaining cancers toward a more aggressive form. The other is that the two groups were not examined in the same way. Finasteride shrinks the prostate and lowers PSA, so the biopsy trigger and the sampling of the gland worked differently in the two arms. The trial as designed cannot separate those explanations.

Eighteen years later, survival was identical

A follow-up published in 2013 tracked the participants for up to 18 years.

Across all 18,880 eligible men, prostate cancer was diagnosed in 989 of 9,423 on finasteride (10.5%) and 1,412 of 9,457 on placebo (14.9%), a relative risk of 0.70 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.76, p<0.001). High-grade cancer was found in 333 (3.5%) against 286 (3.0%), relative risk 1.17 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.37, p=0.05).

Survival at 15 years was 78.0% with finasteride and 78.2% with placebo. The hazard ratio for death was 1.02 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.08, p=0.46). Among men who did develop prostate cancer, ten-year survival was also similar in both groups.

So neither the benefit nor the alarm translated into people living longer or shorter.

What to keep in perspective

  • The endpoint was diagnoses, not deaths. The trial was never designed to show whether men live longer, and the long follow-up says they did not.
  • Detection differed between the arms, which makes the high-grade finding genuinely ambiguous rather than simply reassuring or simply alarming.
  • Sexual side effects were more commonly reported with finasteride; urinary symptoms were more commonly reported with placebo. Those are real costs and benefits paid by well men.
  • Everyone here started with a normal exam and a PSA of 3.0 or below. Results do not carry over to men outside that description.

Questions about prostate cancer prevention

  • Am I in the group this trial studied, and what is my current PSA?
  • If a drug lowers the number of cancers found but not the number of deaths, what is it buying me?
  • What would you monitor if I took something like this for years?

Sources

This article was written from the sources below, which were checked on the source-check date shown above.

How this article was prepared

Prepared by Cancer Explained's AI-assisted editorial system and checked against the sources listed below. This article has not been reviewed by a healthcare professional unless a named reviewer is specifically shown.

Cancer Explained is published by the National Cancer Information Foundation as a nonprofit-oriented public-interest education project. It is not a diagnostic service, does not recommend treatments, and is not for emergencies.

Found an error, a broken source link, outdated information, or wording that feels insensitive? Report it here — we log and act on material corrections.

Know someone who needs this?

Plenty of people are looking for something like this and do not know where to start. If this would help a friend or someone you love, send it on — we have written an opening line so you do not have to stare at an empty message. You can change every word of it.

Email itText itWhatsApp

Your message is written and sent in your own email or messaging app — we never see who you send it to, and nothing is added to any list.

Put the story in context

Prevention, possible warning signs, screening, and diagnosis

This story relates to Prostate cancer. The information below is general: it does not reveal anything else about a public person’s health, and not every point applies to every cancer. Personal advice depends on age, symptoms, family history, exposures, and medical history.

  • Prevention and risk reduction

    Not every cancer can be prevented. Avoiding tobacco, protecting skin from ultraviolet radiation, limiting alcohol, staying active, and receiving recommended HPV or hepatitis B vaccination can lower the risk of certain cancers. A risk factor is not a prediction or a cause in one individual.

    NCI prevention information

  • Symptoms and possible early signs

    Possible signs vary and are often caused by conditions other than cancer. Changes worth discussing include a new lump, unexplained bleeding or weight loss, a persistent cough, lasting bowel or bladder changes, a changing skin spot, or symptoms that persist or worsen. Some early cancers cause no symptoms.

    NCI signs and symptoms

  • Screening and early detection

    Screening looks for certain cancers before symptoms begin. Recommended tests exist only for some cancers and depend on age and risk. Screening can have benefits and harms; it is not the same as evaluating a new symptom, and there is no single routine scan or blood test that reliably screens for every cancer.

    NCI cancer screening information

  • How cancer is diagnosed

    Diagnosis may involve a history and exam, imaging, laboratory tests, and often a biopsy. Pathology can identify the cancer type and may test biomarkers that guide treatment. Symptoms, screening results, tumor markers, or online stories alone cannot confirm cancer.

    NCI diagnosis information

Learn about this story’s cancer topic

A public story may encourage questions, but it should not be used to estimate your risk or choose testing. Contact a healthcare professional about a persistent or concerning change. Seek urgent care for severe or rapidly worsening symptoms.

Go deeper with NCI