Skip to main content
Cancer Explained
Donate

NewsResearch

EMBRACA: What the Breast Cancer Trial Found

EMBRACA compared talazoparib, a daily pill, with chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer driven by an inherited BRCA mutation. It bought time and better reported wellbeing. The final analysis found no difference in survival.

By Cancer Explained Editorial TeamPublished Updated

Original commentary from the Cancer Explained editorial team.

Three lab researchers in coats examine samples together at computer monitors in a laboratory
Three lab researchers in coats examine samples together at computer monitors in a laboratory — illustrative photograph, not of anyone named in this story.

Please note: this page is educational only — it is not medical advice, and it does not speculate about anyone’s health beyond reliable public reporting. For questions about your own health, talk with your healthcare team.

A pill instead of an infusion

BRCA1 and BRCA2 are repair genes. When a cell inherits a broken copy and the working copy fails, one of its main ways of mending broken DNA is gone. PARP inhibitors block a different repair route, and cancer cells that have lost the first one cannot cope without the second.

Talazoparib is one of those drugs: one tablet, once a day, taken at home. EMBRACA compared it with chemotherapy in people whose advanced breast cancer carried an inherited BRCA mutation.

Who could join, and what the comparison was

FieldDetail
TrialEMBRACA
IdentifierNCT01945775
PhasePhase 3
DesignRandomised 2:1, open-label
Cancer typeAdvanced HER2-negative breast cancer with an inherited BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation
ComparatorTalazoparib 1 mg daily, against the physician's choice of capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine or vinorelbine
Primary endpointProgression-free survival, assessed by blinded independent central review

The trial's dosing is recorded here for the sake of the record. If you are on talazoparib, the amount on your own prescription label is the one that counts.

431 people were randomised: 287 to talazoparib and 144 to chemotherapy. The mutation had to be inherited — a germline BRCA change — not one acquired by the tumour alone.

Three months, and a much higher response rate

Median progression-free survival was 8.6 months with talazoparib and 5.6 months with chemotherapy, a hazard ratio of 0.54 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.71, p<0.001).

Tumours shrank in 62.6% of the talazoparib group against 27.2% of the chemotherapy group — an odds ratio of 5.0 (95% CI 2.9 to 8.8, p<0.001). More than twice as many people saw their cancer visibly retreat.

Severe blood-count problems, mainly anaemia, were more common with talazoparib: 55% against 38%. Severe non-blood side effects were slightly less common: 32% against 38%.

What patients reported

The trial collected patient-reported outcomes, and they favoured talazoparib. Global health status and quality of life improved significantly, and the time until a clinically meaningful worsening of either that measure or breast symptoms was significantly longer.

Extended follow-up in 2020 confirmed both of those findings. For a treatment measured in months, how those months feel is a substantial part of the answer.

The final survival analysis found no difference

By the September 2019 cutoff, 216 people on talazoparib (75.3%) and 108 on chemotherapy (75.0%) had died. Median follow-up was 44.9 and 36.8 months.

Median survival was 19.3 months with talazoparib (95% CI 16.6 to 22.5) and 19.5 months with chemotherapy (95% CI 17.4 to 22.4). The hazard ratio was 0.848 (95% CI 0.670 to 1.073, p=0.17).

One complication: most people went on to other treatments afterwards. 32.6% of the chemotherapy group later received a PARP inhibitor, against 4.5% of the talazoparib group. After statistical adjustment for later PARP inhibitor and platinum use, the hazard ratio was 0.756 (95% bootstrap CI 0.503 to 1.029) — still not a demonstrated difference.

Severe side effects across the full follow-up were 69.6% with talazoparib and 64.3% with chemotherapy.

What this trial cannot tell you

  • Whether talazoparib helps people live longer. The final analysis says it did not, and the adjusted analysis did not change that.
  • Whether it applies without an inherited BRCA mutation. Only germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers were eligible.
  • Whether it is the best PARP inhibitor. The comparison was against chemotherapy, not another drug of the same class.
  • What the open-label design cost in precision. Everyone knew whether they were taking a pill or having an infusion, and quality-of-life scores are reported by the patient.

Questions about a BRCA result in breast cancer

  • Was my BRCA change inherited, or found only in the tumour?
  • If this buys time rather than years, what does that change for me?
  • What would you monitor for anaemia, and how often?

Sources

This article was written from the sources below, which were checked on the source-check date shown above.

How this article was prepared

Prepared by Cancer Explained's AI-assisted editorial system and checked against the sources listed below. This article has not been reviewed by a healthcare professional unless a named reviewer is specifically shown.

Cancer Explained is published by the National Cancer Information Foundation as a nonprofit-oriented public-interest education project. It is not a diagnostic service, does not recommend treatments, and is not for emergencies.

Found an error, a broken source link, outdated information, or wording that feels insensitive? Report it here — we log and act on material corrections.

Know someone who needs this?

Plenty of people are looking for something like this and do not know where to start. If this would help a friend or someone you love, send it on — we have written an opening line so you do not have to stare at an empty message. You can change every word of it.

Email itText itWhatsApp

Your message is written and sent in your own email or messaging app — we never see who you send it to, and nothing is added to any list.

Put the story in context

Prevention, possible warning signs, screening, and diagnosis

This story relates to Breast cancer. The information below is general: it does not reveal anything else about a public person’s health, and not every point applies to every cancer. Personal advice depends on age, symptoms, family history, exposures, and medical history.

  • Prevention and risk reduction

    Not every cancer can be prevented. Avoiding tobacco, protecting skin from ultraviolet radiation, limiting alcohol, staying active, and receiving recommended HPV or hepatitis B vaccination can lower the risk of certain cancers. A risk factor is not a prediction or a cause in one individual.

    NCI prevention information

  • Symptoms and possible early signs

    Possible signs vary and are often caused by conditions other than cancer. Changes worth discussing include a new lump, unexplained bleeding or weight loss, a persistent cough, lasting bowel or bladder changes, a changing skin spot, or symptoms that persist or worsen. Some early cancers cause no symptoms.

    NCI signs and symptoms

  • Screening and early detection

    Screening looks for certain cancers before symptoms begin. Recommended tests exist only for some cancers and depend on age and risk. Screening can have benefits and harms; it is not the same as evaluating a new symptom, and there is no single routine scan or blood test that reliably screens for every cancer.

    NCI cancer screening information

  • How cancer is diagnosed

    Diagnosis may involve a history and exam, imaging, laboratory tests, and often a biopsy. Pathology can identify the cancer type and may test biomarkers that guide treatment. Symptoms, screening results, tumor markers, or online stories alone cannot confirm cancer.

    NCI diagnosis information

Learn about this story’s cancer topic

A public story may encourage questions, but it should not be used to estimate your risk or choose testing. Contact a healthcare professional about a persistent or concerning change. Seek urgent care for severe or rapidly worsening symptoms.

Go deeper with NCI