NewsResearch
Why Childhood Cancer Is Hard to Research — and What Is Changing
For Childhood Cancer Awareness Month, an NCI pediatric oncologist explained why children's cancers are so hard to study: some are diagnosed in only 40 to 50 children a year in the US. Here is what that means for families.
Original commentary from the Cancer Explained editorial team.

Please note: this page is educational only — it is not medical advice, and it does not speculate about anyone’s health beyond reliable public reporting. For questions about your own health, talk with your healthcare team.
September is Childhood Cancer Awareness Month. On September 14, 2026, the National Cancer Institute published a talk with Dr. Brigitte Widemann. She leads the Pediatric Oncology Branch in NCI's Center for Cancer Research. She also advises the NCI director on childhood cancer. She treats children at the NIH Clinical Center and works on rare tumors and inherited conditions that raise cancer risk.
One number from that conversation explains most of the rest of it.
Every childhood cancer is a rare cancer
Dr. Widemann's point is that all cancers in children are rare. Some are very rare. A few types are found in only 40 to 50 children a year in the whole United States.
That single fact creates most of the difficulty:
- Expertise is hard to build. A doctor may see a particular tumor once or twice in a career.
- Studies are hard to run. A trial needs enough participants to tell a real effect from chance. If there are 45 children a year in the country, a trial at one hospital is not possible.
- Commercial interest is smaller. As the NCI post notes, companies have less reason to make drugs for these cancers. Adult cancers have far more patients.
None of that makes the cancers less serious to the family living with one. It just means the usual machinery of medical research does not fit.
What gets built to work around it
So the answer has mostly been to link hospitals together. No single one will ever have enough patients on its own.
The NCI post describes the Children's Oncology Group. It is a clinical trials network with more than 200 member sites. The post also names the Pediatric Early Phase Clinical Trials Network, the Pediatric Immunotherapy Network and the myPART network for rare tumors. The Childhood Cancer Data Initiative, launched in 2019, exists to pool data across those places. Its Molecular Characterization Initiative offers detailed tumor testing at the time of diagnosis, with results returned within two to three weeks.
This is why families are so often asked about a clinical trial early in a child's cancer care. Sometimes a trial is the standard path, not a last resort. In a disease with 45 cases a year, the trial is frequently where the best available knowledge lives.
Two advances she points to
The conversation names two:
- Adding the immunotherapy drug blinatumomab to chemotherapy "substantially improved disease-free survival" for children with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Fewer children had the cancer come back.
- Atezolizumab was approved by the FDA for alveolar soft part sarcoma, an extremely rare cancer in children that previously had no approved treatment.
She also stresses what comes after. Researchers need to study the long-term effects of newer treatments, including immunotherapy. That means effects on mental health, fertility, work and relationships in people who had cancer as children. Surviving is the beginning of the question, not the end of it.
What this does not mean
- It does not describe any individual child's outlook. A conversation about research strategy says nothing about one child's diagnosis, treatment or chances. That belongs with the treating team.
- It does not mean the named advances apply broadly. Blinatumomab was discussed for one leukemia type; atezolizumab was approved for one very rare sarcoma. Neither is general childhood cancer news.
- It does not mean a trial is right for every family. Trials have eligibility rules, travel demands and unknowns. Being asked about one is an invitation to ask questions, not an obligation.
- It does not settle the long-term picture for newer treatments. That is stated in the source as work still underway, which is the honest position.
What to ask a child's care team
- Is a clinical trial part of standard care for this diagnosis? Is there one my child can join?
- Has my child's tumor had molecular testing, and when will those results come back?
- Which center in our region sees this diagnosis most often, and would a second opinion there be useful?
- What long-term follow-up will my child need after treatment ends, and who arranges it?
How this article was prepared
An AI-assisted editorial system helped prepare this page. It used the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Currents interview of September 14, 2026. It was opened on the source-check date shown above. No named medical reviewer has reviewed it unless one is listed.
Cancer Explained is published by the National Cancer Information Foundation. It is not medical advice and does not suggest a test or treatment.
See an error, old source, or unclear wording? Tell us.
Know someone who needs this?
Plenty of people are looking for something like this and do not know where to start. If this would help a friend or someone you love, send it on — we have written an opening line so you do not have to stare at an empty message. You can change every word of it.
Your message is written and sent in your own email or messaging app — we never see who you send it to, and nothing is added to any list.
Put the story in context
Prevention, possible warning signs, screening, and diagnosis
This story relates to Childhood cancer. The information below is general: it does not reveal anything else about a public person’s health, and not every point applies to every cancer. Personal advice depends on age, symptoms, family history, exposures, and medical history.
Prevention and risk reduction
Not every cancer can be prevented. Avoiding tobacco, protecting skin from ultraviolet radiation, limiting alcohol, staying active, and receiving recommended HPV or hepatitis B vaccination can lower the risk of certain cancers. A risk factor is not a prediction or a cause in one individual.
Symptoms and possible early signs
Possible signs vary and are often caused by conditions other than cancer. Changes worth discussing include a new lump, unexplained bleeding or weight loss, a persistent cough, lasting bowel or bladder changes, a changing skin spot, or symptoms that persist or worsen. Some early cancers cause no symptoms.
Screening and early detection
Screening looks for certain cancers before symptoms begin. Recommended tests exist only for some cancers and depend on age and risk. Screening can have benefits and harms; it is not the same as evaluating a new symptom, and there is no single routine scan or blood test that reliably screens for every cancer.
How cancer is diagnosed
Diagnosis may involve a history and exam, imaging, laboratory tests, and often a biopsy. Pathology can identify the cancer type and may test biomarkers that guide treatment. Symptoms, screening results, tumor markers, or online stories alone cannot confirm cancer.
A public story may encourage questions, but it should not be used to estimate your risk or choose testing. Contact a healthcare professional about a persistent or concerning change. Seek urgent care for severe or rapidly worsening symptoms.