The short answer
Hedged wording in a radiology report describes the limits of that particular scan rather than the radiologist's suspicion. The Impression carries the actual conclusion.
Cannot be excluded describes what this scan could not settle, not what the radiologist suspects.
Clinical correlation recommended is a request for information the radiologist does not have, usually your symptoms and history.
Findings lists everything visible, including incidental things; Impression carries the conclusion your team acts on.
Indeterminate, nonspecific and ill-defined describe pattern and image quality, not severity.
Choose how you want to understand this
The full explanation.
Why These Reports Sound Worse Than They Are
A CT or MRI report is one radiologist's description of shades of gray. Imaging shows shape, size, density, and how tissue takes up contrast. It does not show cells, and it cannot separate benign from malignant with certainty. Because the radiologist is describing appearance rather than identity, the language is deliberately provisional. Provisional language, read alone on a phone screen, sounds like bad news being softened. Usually it is not.
How the Report Is Organized
Most reports follow a fixed order: the exam type and date, the clinical history or reason for the scan, any prior studies used for comparison, the technique, then Findings, then Impression. Findings is an inventory of everything visible, including things nobody was looking for. Impression is the radiologist's summary and recommendation, and it is the part your oncologist acts on.
"Cannot Be Excluded"
This phrase describes the limits of the scan, not the radiologist's level of suspicion. It means that this imaging test, at this resolution, using this contrast, cannot definitively rule a possibility out. A radiologist listing three possibilities is not saying you have the worst one. They are recording what the pictures can and cannot settle, so that whoever reads the report next knows exactly how much certainty they are being handed.
"Clinical Correlation Recommended"
This is a request for information the radiologist does not have. The person interpreting your scan often never meets you, may not know your symptoms, your medication list, or your surgical history, and is asking the ordering clinician to combine the images with those facts. It is a handoff instruction between colleagues. It is not a hint that something worrying was seen and left unsaid.
"Indeterminate", "Nonspecific" and "Ill-Defined"
Indeterminate means the finding does not have the classic appearance of anything in particular, so it cannot be labeled from these images alone. Nonspecific means the same thing in different words. Ill-defined refers to how sharply the edge of something is drawn on the image, which depends heavily on slice thickness, motion, contrast timing, and where the finding sits. These words describe pattern and picture quality, not severity.
"Suspicious For" and "Concerning For"
These do carry weight, and they are used when the appearance genuinely favors a particular diagnosis. Even then, they are a call for the next step, usually tissue sampling or a more targeted scan, rather than a diagnosis in themselves. Imaging almost never ends the question alone. Pathology does.
Incidental Findings
Modern scans cover more anatomy at higher resolution than the question being asked requires, so they routinely turn up things unrelated to your cancer: small cysts, benign nodules, old scarring, mild degenerative changes in the spine. Many of these are so common that they count as normal variation. They appear in Findings because the radiologist documents everything visible, not because each one needs action.
Comparison and Change
If a prior scan was available, the report will say so, and much of its value lies in that comparison. Stable, unchanged, and no significant interval change are strong statements in imaging language. Measurements that shift by a few millimeters between scans usually reflect measurement variation rather than growth, because different slices, different machines and different readers produce slightly different numbers on the same lesion.
Reading It Before Your Appointment
Results now often reach your portal before your clinician has looked at them. If a phrase frightens you, note the exact wording and check whether it sits in Findings or in the Impression. Then send one specific message rather than a general one: quoting the sentence and asking what it changes in the plan gets a far more useful answer than asking whether the scan was bad. If the report recommends a specific next step or follow-up interval, that recommendation is the practical content, and confirming it has been scheduled is usually the most productive thing available to you while waiting.
Sources
Words to know
Tap any term to see what it means.

Common questions
The report lists several possible causes. Does that mean I have the worst one?
No. A differential is a list of what could produce that appearance, usually ordered by likelihood, and it exists because imaging shows shape and density rather than cell type. Listing a serious possibility records that the scan could not rule it out.
Why does the report ask for clinical correlation?
The radiologist interpreting your scan often has not met you and may not know your symptoms, medications or surgical history. The phrase asks the ordering clinician to combine the images with those facts. It is a handoff between colleagues.
Should I read Findings or Impression?
Impression. Findings is a complete inventory of everything visible, including incidental cysts, old scarring and degenerative changes that need no action. Impression is the radiologist's summary and any recommended next step.
The measurement changed by 3 mm since my last scan. Is it growing?
Usually not. Different slices, scanners, contrast timing and readers produce slightly different numbers on the same lesion. Radiologists generally look for change well beyond a few millimeters before calling something progression.
Questions to ask your doctor
Being prepared helps you get the most out of your appointments. Save or print these questions.
Tap a question to save it to your list (kept on this device).
Speak With Trained Specialists & Human Navigators
Cancer Explained provides educational guidance, but does not replace trained specialists, social workers, or your medical team.
Talk to a trained cancer information specialist
Free, confidential assistance from NCI Cancer Information Service via phone, chat, or email.
Contact your oncology team
Locate after-hours contact numbers, portal messages, or urgent triage phone lines.
Find a patient navigator
Get one-on-one help with appointments, logistics, translation, and care coordination.
Find a genetic counselor
Discuss inherited mutation risk, family history, and genetic testing options.
Find an oncology social worker
Access emotional counseling, family support groups, and mental health resources.
Find a financial navigator
Locate copay assistance foundations, grant programs, and lodging/travel support.
Find a clinical-trial specialist
Search matching studies and speak with NCI trial information specialists.
Get urgent help
Immediate emergency guidance for fever (>100.4°F during chemo), severe pain, or shortness of breath.
Help Us Improve This Guide
Did this explanation answer your question and help you determine your next step?
Know someone who needs this?
Plenty of people are looking for something like this and do not know where to start. If this would help a friend or someone you love, send it on — we have written an opening line so you do not have to stare at an empty message. You can change every word of it.
Your message is written and sent in your own email or messaging app — we never see who you send it to, and nothing is added to any list.
Plain-language explanation of the federal sources cited on this page. AI-assisted, source-checked, not clinician-reviewed.
Written by: Cancer Explained Editorial TeamSources last checked: 2026-07-30Last updated: 2026-07-30Next planned review: 2028-07-29
How this page was created
Cancer Explained does not originate medical claims. Every page restates guidance already published by the National Cancer Institute, the CDC, the USPSTF and the FDA, in plain language, with the source cited so you can check the original yourself. AI does the translating and organizing; automated checks test claims, citations, clarity and safety before anything publishes. We do not employ clinicians and do not intend to — our work is translation and navigation, not clinical judgment. Nothing here is personal medical advice, and no page can account for your particular situation.
Editorial status — Source verified. This page was created with AI assistance and checked against the sources listed on it. Source checking is not a medical review.
General education. Low-risk educational or organizational content. Medical facts are cited to authoritative sources.
Human medical review: not completed. Cancer Explained is not clinician-reviewed, and that is a deliberate design choice rather than a gap we are waiting to close. We restate published federal guidance and cite it; the authority belongs to the source, not to us. That is why every page names where its claims come from — so you can verify us instead of trusting us. Use it to understand your situation and to ask better questions of the people treating you.
How this page was created
Cancer Explained does not originate medical claims. Every page restates guidance already published by the National Cancer Institute, the CDC, the USPSTF and the FDA, in plain language, with the source cited so you can check the original yourself. AI does the translating and organizing; automated checks test claims, citations, clarity and safety before anything publishes. We do not employ clinicians and do not intend to — our work is translation and navigation, not clinical judgment. Nothing here is personal medical advice, and no page can account for your particular situation.
Editorial status: Source verified — This page was created with AI assistance and checked against the sources listed on it. Source checking is not a medical review.
Human medical review: not completed. Cancer Explained is not clinician-reviewed, and that is a deliberate design choice rather than a gap we are waiting to close. We restate published federal guidance and cite it; the authority belongs to the source, not to us. That is why every page names where its claims come from — so you can verify us instead of trusting us. Use it to understand your situation and to ask better questions of the people treating you.
Read more about our editorial process, our use of AI, and our corrections policy.
Spotted a problem? Report an error — a factual mistake, broken or outdated source, confusing wording, or anything that seems unsafe. Please do not include names, medical record numbers, dates of birth, addresses, or other identifying medical information in your report.
After using this page, do you understand what to do next?
Anonymous — we only record the answer, never who gave it.
Related articles
- A Symptom Is Not a Diagnosis
- What Symptoms Should I Call My Oncology Team About Today?
- Cancer-Prevention Claims: Evidence, Uncertainty, or Myth?
- How to Read a Cancer Pathology Report
- Understanding Gleason Scores and Grade Groups
- When Patient Portal Test Results Cause Panic
- Why PET Scans Show Areas of Uptake (Hypermetabolism)
Still have questions?
Educational answers, plain language
Free to print and share
