Skip to main content
Cancer Explained
Donate
Intermediate 9 min readSource checked

The Philadelphia Chromosome: The One Cancer Story With an Unusually Clean Ending, and What NCI Says Now

Jessica Wapner's account of the discovery behind Gleevec and chronic myeloid leukemia treatment, checked against NCI's current description of CML and its targeted drugs.

NCI source

NCI — Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatment (PDQ) Patient Version

Woman in a seated twist on a yoga mat in a sunlit living room filled with houseplants.
Gentle Yoga At Home

Key fact

The Philadelphia chromosome, identified in 1960, was the first specific genetic abnormality ever linked to a human cancer.

The short answer

The Philadelphia Chromosome traces a single genetic discovery, made in 1960, through five decades of research to the drug imatinib, marketed as Gleevec, which transformed chronic myeloid leukemia from a fatal diagnosis into a manageable chronic condition for most patients. This page pairs Jessica Wapner's history with NCI's current description of CML treatment, since drug options have expanded since the book's 2013 publication.

  • The Philadelphia chromosome, identified in 1960, was the first specific genetic abnormality ever linked to a human cancer.

  • The Experiment published the book in 2013, subtitled A Mutant Gene and the Quest to Cure Cancer at the Genetic Level.

  • NCI describes the Philadelphia chromosome as forming when parts of chromosomes 9 and 22 swap, fusing the BCR and ABL1 genes and driving CML.

  • NCI lists tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, and asciminib, as the primary treatment across CML phases.

About this book

Author:
Jessica Wapner
First published:
2013
Publisher:
The Experiment
Type:
Popular science
Pages:
320
ISBN:
9781615190676
Cancer covered:
Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), traced through the discovery of the Philadelphia chromosome and the development of imatinib.

Edition and publication detailsFind it in a library

This page describes a published book for education. We have no financial relationship with any author or publisher and earn nothing if you buy it. A book — including one written by a doctor — is not medical advice, and one person’s experience is not a guide to your own care.

Choose how you want to understand this

The full explanation.

What the book is

The Philadelphia Chromosome: A Mutant Gene and the Quest to Cure Cancer at the Genetic Level is Jessica Wapner's history of one of oncology's clearest research success stories: the discovery of a specific chromosomal abnormality behind chronic myeloid leukemia, and the five-decade path from that discovery to a drug that transformed the disease's prognosis. The Experiment published it in 2013.

It is a science history, not a memoir. Wapner, a science journalist, builds the book around the scientists whose work connected a 1960 microscope observation to a targeted drug approved in 2001, with patient accounts appearing later in the narrative as the drug reaches clinical use rather than anchoring the book throughout.

Its central subject, the Philadelphia chromosome, was the first specific genetic abnormality ever linked directly to a human cancer, discovered by researchers Peter Nowell and David Hungerford in Philadelphia in 1960, which gives the book both its title and its organizing thread.

Because the book follows a single scientific line to its conclusion, a functioning drug, it reads with more narrative momentum than most science histories, which often end with an open question rather than a clear result. That clean arc is also worth reading carefully, since CML's trajectory is not typical of most cancers, most of which do not have a single dominant genetic driver this well understood or this directly targetable.

The book is also, in a quiet way, a history of how cancer research itself has been organized and funded in the United States over the second half of the twentieth century. Wapner follows researchers across academic institutions, pharmaceutical companies, and federal funding bodies, and the difficulty of keeping a research line alive across decades, career changes, and shifting institutional priorities is as much a subject of the book as the biology itself.

What's inside

The book moves in three broad stages. It opens with the 1960 discovery itself: two Philadelphia researchers noticing an unusually short chromosome in the cells of leukemia patients, at a time when the idea that cancer had a specific genetic cause was not yet established.

The middle section covers the decades of subsequent research needed to understand what that abnormal chromosome actually did: identifying the specific genes involved, BCR and ABL1, understanding how their fusion produced an abnormal protein driving uncontrolled white blood cell production, and the long, uncertain process of translating that molecular understanding into a drug candidate capable of blocking the abnormal protein specifically, rather than harming healthy cells broadly the way older chemotherapy did.

The final section follows the drug, imatinib, through its clinical trials and 2001 approval, and describes its effect on patients whose prognosis before the drug's arrival had been measured in a small number of years. This is where the book's structure shifts briefly toward individual patient accounts, illustrating what the research translated into for people actually living with the diagnosis.

Where it is strongest

The book's strength is that it makes a genuinely technical molecular story readable without oversimplifying the science, tracing exactly how a chromosomal abnormality becomes an actionable drug target, a process most popular science writing about cancer treats as a black box.

It is also valuable as a case study in how long targeted drug development actually takes, and how uncertain it looks from the inside. Four decades separated the initial 1960 discovery from the drug's 2001 approval, and the book does not smooth over the dead ends, funding struggles, and skepticism that filled those decades. That is a useful corrective for a reader who expects a straight line from genetic discovery to available treatment. The book describes periods where the research nearly stalled for lack of funding or institutional interest, and where the eventual drug's development depended on individual researchers and companies willing to pursue a molecular target that, for years, had no proven clinical payoff. Readers who assume that a clear scientific target guarantees a fast path to treatment will find that assumption directly challenged here.

Because CML's story is unusually complete, discovery, mechanism, drug, approval, and clear clinical benefit, the book also works well as an accessible introduction to how targeted cancer therapy works in general, using one of the field's cleanest examples to explain a mechanism that applies, in less tidy form, across much of modern oncology.

Where to read it carefully

The book was written in 2013, and CML treatment has continued to develop since then. At the time of writing, imatinib was the central, defining drug in the story; it remains an important option today, but it is no longer the only one, and it is not automatically the first choice for every patient.

The book's framing, understandably, treats imatinib's approval as close to an ending. In practice, treatment for CML has continued to be refined since 2013, including additional approved drugs and more detailed guidance on managing side effects, resistance, and, for some patients, the possibility of eventually stopping treatment. A reader using the book to understand current CML treatment specifically should treat it as the origin story of a drug class rather than a current treatment guide.

The book's clean narrative arc is also somewhat particular to CML. Most cancers do not have a single, well-understood genetic driver of this kind, and readers should not extrapolate from CML's relatively rapid transformation into targeted-therapy success to expect a similar timeline or a similarly dramatic single breakthrough for other cancer types, many of which involve multiple interacting genetic changes rather than one dominant fusion gene.

The treatment landscape now, versus in this book

NCI's current patient-facing treatment information for CML describes the same underlying biology the book covers, in language worth stating directly. In CML, part of the DNA from chromosome 9 moves to chromosome 22, and this rearrangement is called the Philadelphia chromosome. It results in the bone marrow producing an abnormal protein, a tyrosine kinase, that causes too many blood stem cells to develop into white blood cells.

Where NCI's information moves past the book is treatment options. NCI lists tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy as the primary approach across CML phases, and names several specific drugs beyond imatinib: dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, and asciminib. Each blocks the same abnormal protein, but they differ in side effect profiles, resistance patterns, and which specific mutations they remain effective against, giving physicians options the book's single-drug narrative does not reflect. NCI also notes that stem cell transplant remains part of the treatment landscape for more advanced phases of the disease, used alongside or after tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy rather than as a replacement for it in most cases.

That expansion matters practically. A patient today whose CML does not respond well to, or cannot tolerate, imatinib specifically has several additional targeted options the book's protagonists did not have in 2001, a direct continuation of the research trajectory the book describes rather than a departure from it.

There is also a monitoring dimension the book, focused on the drug's discovery and approval, does not dwell on: how treatment response in CML is actually tracked. Because the disease is defined by a specific molecular marker, response can be measured with unusual precision, through blood tests tracking the BCR::ABL1 gene's activity over time, rather than relying only on imaging or symptoms. That precision, itself a direct legacy of the discovery the book describes, is part of why some patients with a sustained, very low or undetectable level of disease can, under close specialist supervision, eventually attempt stopping treatment, something not established as a realistic possibility when the book was written.

For the fuller current picture, see chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), leukemia treatment by type, and, for the broader history this discovery sits within, The Emperor of All Maladies.

Who this book suits

It suits a reader who wants to understand how targeted cancer therapy actually gets discovered and developed, told through one of the field's clearest and most complete examples. It is a good choice for someone recently diagnosed with CML who wants to understand the science behind their own treatment's origin, as long as they pair it with current information about their specific drug options.

It is less suited to a reader looking for a personal, emotional account of living with CML day to day, since the book is built around the science and its history rather than around any one patient's ongoing experience. And a reader hoping the book will explain most cancers' genetics, rather than this one unusually well-understood case, should know that CML's story, while real and important, is not representative of how most cancer genetics work. It also is not the source to consult for guidance on side effects, dosing, or day-to-day life on a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, since the book stops largely at the point of approval rather than following patients through years of ongoing treatment, which is where most of the practical questions a newly diagnosed CML patient actually has tend to live.

Cancer Explained is free and ad-free, and you can support this work if it helped.

Sources

This page discusses The Philadelphia Chromosome for education. It is not medical advice, and nothing here is a judgement of anyone's real medical care.

Words to know

Tap any term to see what it means.

Browse the full glossary →

Woman in a blue tank top drinks from a water bottle in a sunlit park after exercising.

Common questions

What is the Philadelphia chromosome?

NCI describes it as a genetic abnormality in which part of chromosome 9 and part of chromosome 22 trade places, fusing the ABL1 and BCR genes. That fusion drives chronic myeloid leukemia.

Is this book about a patient's story?

No. It is a history of the science, tracing the discovery through decades of laboratory and clinical research to the drug's approval, using scientists and, later, patients as sources rather than centering one person's illness.

Is imatinib still the standard CML treatment?

It remains an important option, but NCI lists several tyrosine kinase inhibitors now available, and treatment choice depends on the specific case, which is a change since the book's single-drug focus in 2013.

Why is CML often called a research success story?

Because a specific molecular cause was identified decades before an effective targeted drug existed, and once that drug arrived, it changed outcomes for many patients dramatically, a sequence not yet achieved for most other cancer types.

Does this mean CML is cured?

No. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors control CML for most patients rather than curing it outright, and treatment is often long-term. Some patients can eventually stop treatment under close monitoring, but that is a specific, individualized decision made with a hematologist.

Questions to ask your doctor

Being prepared helps you get the most out of your appointments. Save or print these questions.

Open my question list

Tap a question to save it to your list (kept on this device).

Human Connection Layer

Speak With Trained Specialists & Human Navigators

Cancer Explained provides educational guidance, but does not replace trained specialists, social workers, or your medical team.

Free & Confidential

Talk to a trained cancer information specialist

Free, confidential assistance from NCI Cancer Information Service via phone, chat, or email.

Contact your oncology team

Locate after-hours contact numbers, portal messages, or urgent triage phone lines.

Find a patient navigator

Get one-on-one help with appointments, logistics, translation, and care coordination.

Find a genetic counselor

Discuss inherited mutation risk, family history, and genetic testing options.

Find an oncology social worker

Access emotional counseling, family support groups, and mental health resources.

Find a financial navigator

Locate copay assistance foundations, grant programs, and lodging/travel support.

Find a clinical-trial specialist

Search matching studies and speak with NCI trial information specialists.

Get urgent help

Immediate emergency guidance for fever (>100.4°F during chemo), severe pain, or shortness of breath.

Know someone who needs this?

Plenty of people are looking for something like this and do not know where to start. If this would help a friend or someone you love, send it on — we have written an opening line so you do not have to stare at an empty message. You can change every word of it.

Email itText itWhatsApp

Your message is written and sent in your own email or messaging app — we never see who you send it to, and nothing is added to any list.

Plain-language explanation of the published sources cited on this page. AI-assisted, source-checked, not clinician-reviewed.

Written by: Cancer ExplainedSources last checked: 2026-09-03 what this meansLast updated: 2026-09-03Next planned review: 2028-09-03

How this page was created

Cancer Explained does not originate medical claims. Every page restates guidance already published by the National Cancer Institute, the CDC, the USPSTF and the FDA, in plain language, with the source cited so you can check the original yourself. AI does the translating and organizing; automated checks test claims, citations, clarity and safety before anything publishes, and this is translation and navigation, not clinical judgment. Nothing here is personal medical advice, and no page can account for your particular situation.

Editorial status — Source checked. This page was written with AI assistance and checked line by line against the sources listed on it. That confirms the sources support what the page says. It is not a medical review, and it does not confirm the page is complete or right for your situation.

General education. Low-risk educational or organizational content. Medical facts are cited to authoritative sources.

Human medical review: not completed. Pages here are not signed off by a clinician before they publish. That is not an oversight we are quietly working around: we restate published guidance and cite it, so the authority belongs to the source rather than to us, and every page names where its claims come from — you can verify us instead of trusting us. Where a volunteer clinician has reviewed a page, their name and credentials appear on it; where no name appears, no clinician has checked it. We are glad to have reviewers and are recruiting them, and we do not hold pages back waiting for one. Use this site to understand your situation and to ask better questions of the people treating you.

Our editorial processHow we use AIReport an error

How this page was created

Cancer Explained does not originate medical claims. Every page restates guidance already published by the National Cancer Institute, the CDC, the USPSTF and the FDA, in plain language, with the source cited so you can check the original yourself. AI does the translating and organizing; automated checks test claims, citations, clarity and safety before anything publishes, and this is translation and navigation, not clinical judgment. Nothing here is personal medical advice, and no page can account for your particular situation.

Editorial status: Source checked This page was written with AI assistance and checked line by line against the sources listed on it. That confirms the sources support what the page says. It is not a medical review, and it does not confirm the page is complete or right for your situation.

Human medical review: not completed. Pages here are not signed off by a clinician before they publish. That is not an oversight we are quietly working around: we restate published guidance and cite it, so the authority belongs to the source rather than to us, and every page names where its claims come from — you can verify us instead of trusting us. Where a volunteer clinician has reviewed a page, their name and credentials appear on it; where no name appears, no clinician has checked it. We are glad to have reviewers and are recruiting them, and we do not hold pages back waiting for one. Use this site to understand your situation and to ask better questions of the people treating you.

Read more about our editorial process, our use of AI, and our corrections policy.

Spotted a problem? Report an error — a factual mistake, broken or outdated source, confusing wording, or anything that seems unsafe. Please do not include names, medical record numbers, dates of birth, addresses, or other identifying medical information in your report.

After using this page, do you understand what to do next?

Anonymous — we only record the answer, never who gave it.