The short answer
Audre Lorde published The Cancer Journals in 1980, after a modified radical mastectomy. It moves between journal entry, memoir and essay. It is a book about experience and politics, not a guide to treatment, so read it as history. NCI still reports that Black women are more likely than White women to die of breast cancer despite lower incidence.
Her publisher, Aunt Lute Books, describes the book as a feminist analysis of Lorde's experience with breast cancer and a modified radical mastectomy, originally published in 1980.
The book is not a guide to treatment. For current information, use NCI's breast cancer pages.
USPSTF now recommends biennial screening mammography for women aged 40 to 74, a Grade B recommendation, which did not exist in this form in 1980.
NCI reports that Black women have lower breast cancer incidence than White women but are more likely to die of the disease.
On this page
About this book
- Author:
- Audre Lorde
- First published:
- 1980
- Publisher:
- Aunt Lute Books
- Type:
- Essay
- Cancer covered:
- Breast cancer treated with modified radical mastectomy, and its aftermath.
Edition and publication details — Find it in a library
This page describes a published book for education. We have no financial relationship with any author or publisher and earn nothing if you buy it. A book — including one written by a doctor — is not medical advice, and one person’s experience is not a guide to your own care.
Choose how you want to read this
The whole article, with every detail and caution.
What the book is
The Cancer Journals is a book Audre Lorde first published in 1980. Her publisher, Aunt Lute Books, describes it as a profoundly feminist analysis of her experience with breast cancer and a modified radical mastectomy.
The publisher says the text moves between journal entry, memoir and exposition. It also says Lorde refuses the silencing and invisibility she experienced, both as a woman facing her own death and as a woman coping with the loss of her breast.
It is not a guide. It is a personal and political account. This page does not summarize the book chapter by chapter. For that, read the book or the publisher's page.
Reading it alongside current guidance
A book from 1980 cannot tell you what to do today. Breast cancer care and screening guidance have changed since it was published. If you are making decisions about surgery, tests or treatment, use current sources and your care team.
Screening is one example. USPSTF recommends screening mammography every two years for women aged 40 to 74, as a Grade B recommendation. For women 75 and older it says the evidence is not enough to judge benefits and harms. It makes no recommendation for women under 40.
Treatment is another. NCI says breast cancer treatment depends on stage and on the tumor's characteristics. It describes triple-negative breast cancer as cancer that does not have the targets typically used to treat other types, but says treatment options are available. For stages I to III, NCI lists surgery, chemotherapy, radiation when indicated, pembrolizumab with chemotherapy, and olaparib for people with BRCA1 or BRCA2 changes. For metastatic disease it lists chemotherapy, olaparib for BRCA changes, sacituzumab govitecan and pembrolizumab.
If you are weighing surgery, ask your team about all options, including breast reconstruction and closing the chest flat without reconstruction. See mastectomy, reconstruction and flat closure experiences.
NCI's SEER program reports 5-year relative survival for female breast cancer at 91.9 percent. It says about 13.0 percent of women will be diagnosed with breast cancer in their lifetime. These figures describe large groups. They cannot predict what happens to one person, and they average across all stages at diagnosis. For the current overview see breast cancer and breast cancer screening.
Disparities, as the federal data has it
This is where Lorde's argument has aged best, and least comfortably.
NCI defines cancer disparities as gaps between groups of people. The gaps show up in measures such as new cases, deaths and survival. On breast cancer specifically, NCI states that Black women have lower breast cancer incidence than White women but are more likely to die of the disease. CDC states that for non-Hispanic Black women and Hispanic women, breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death.
NCI does not attribute this to biology alone. It names social determinants of health: income, insurance status and access to transportation. It also names neighborhood conditions, institutional racism and the chronic stress it causes, and conscious or unconscious bias from health providers. It says inherited factors or tumor biology may also play a part. The same page states that Black men are more than twice as likely as White men to die of prostate cancer. It also states that Black women have the highest death rates from cervical cancer.
Whether the book itself speaks to these gaps is for the reader to judge. See Black Americans and cancer for how this looks in practice.
Who this book suits
It suits readers who want to think about what illness does to identity, looks and voice. It does not suit a reader who needs current information about breast cancer. For that, use the sources below and your care team.
Sources
- The Cancer Journals — publisher's page (Aunt Lute Books)
- NCI — Cancer Disparities
- CDC — Breast Cancer Statistics
- USPSTF — Breast Cancer: Screening
- NCI — Breast Cancer Treatment (PDQ) Patient Version
- NCI — Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treatment
- NCI SEER — Cancer Stat Facts: Female Breast Cancer
This page discusses The Cancer Journals for education. It is not medical advice, and nothing here is a judgement of anyone's real medical care.

Common questions
What is The Cancer Journals about?
Audre Lorde's own breast cancer and the modified radical mastectomy she had. Her publisher says it moves between journal entry, memoir and exposition.
Is the medical information still accurate?
Do not use it for medical decisions. It was published in 1980, and breast cancer care and screening guidance have changed since. Use NCI, CDC and USPSTF for current information.
Why is it still recommended?
Because its subject is not treatment. Its publisher describes it as a feminist analysis of her experience, and says Lorde refuses the silencing and invisibility she experienced.
Is it a hard read?
Its publisher says it moves between journal entry, memoir and exposition. Readers expecting a single story may find that shift demanding.
Questions to ask your doctor
Being prepared helps you get the most out of your appointments. Save or print these questions.
Tap a question to save it to your list (kept on this device).
Talk with a trained specialist or navigator
Cancer Explained provides educational guidance, but does not replace trained specialists, social workers, or your medical team.
Talk to a trained cancer information specialist
Free, confidential assistance from NCI Cancer Information Service via phone, chat, or email.
Contact your oncology team
Locate after-hours contact numbers, portal messages, or urgent triage phone lines.
Find a patient navigator
Get one-on-one help with appointments, logistics, translation, and care coordination.
Find a genetic counselor
Discuss inherited mutation risk, family history, and genetic testing options.
Find an oncology social worker
Access emotional counseling, family support groups, and mental health resources.
Find a financial navigator
Locate copay assistance foundations, grant programs, and lodging/travel support.
Find a clinical-trial specialist
Search matching studies and speak with NCI trial information specialists.
Plain-language explanation of the published sources cited on this page. AI-assisted, source-checked, not clinician-reviewed.
Written by: Cancer ExplainedSources last checked: 2026-10-02 what this meansLast updated: 2026-10-02Next planned review: 2028-09-03
Review details and limits
Cancer Explained does not originate medical claims. Every page restates guidance already published by the National Cancer Institute, the CDC, the USPSTF and the FDA, in plain language, with the source cited so you can check the original yourself. AI does the translating and organizing; automated checks test claims, citations, clarity and safety before anything publishes, and this is translation and navigation, not clinical judgment. Nothing here is personal medical advice, and no page can account for your particular situation.
Editorial status — Source checked. This page was written with AI assistance and then compared with the sources listed on it, looking for statements those sources do not back up. That check is not a sentence-by-sentence record and can miss errors. It is not a medical review, and it does not confirm the page is complete or right for your situation.
General education. Low-risk educational or organizational content. Medical facts are cited to authoritative sources.
Human medical review: not completed. Pages here are not signed off by a clinician before they publish. That is not an oversight we are quietly working around: we restate published guidance and cite it, so the authority belongs to the source rather than to us, and every page names where its claims come from — you can verify us instead of trusting us. Where a volunteer clinician has reviewed a page, their name and credentials appear on it; where no name appears, no clinician has checked it. We are glad to have reviewers and are recruiting them, and we do not hold pages back waiting for one. Use this site to understand your situation and to ask better questions of the people treating you.
Words to know
Tap any term to see what it means.
How this page was created
Cancer Explained does not originate medical claims. Every page restates guidance already published by the National Cancer Institute, the CDC, the USPSTF and the FDA, in plain language, with the source cited so you can check the original yourself. AI does the translating and organizing; automated checks test claims, citations, clarity and safety before anything publishes, and this is translation and navigation, not clinical judgment. Nothing here is personal medical advice, and no page can account for your particular situation.
Editorial status: Source checked — This page was written with AI assistance and then compared with the sources listed on it, looking for statements those sources do not back up. That check is not a sentence-by-sentence record and can miss errors. It is not a medical review, and it does not confirm the page is complete or right for your situation.
Human medical review: not completed. Pages here are not signed off by a clinician before they publish. That is not an oversight we are quietly working around: we restate published guidance and cite it, so the authority belongs to the source rather than to us, and every page names where its claims come from — you can verify us instead of trusting us. Where a volunteer clinician has reviewed a page, their name and credentials appear on it; where no name appears, no clinician has checked it. We are glad to have reviewers and are recruiting them, and we do not hold pages back waiting for one. Use this site to understand your situation and to ask better questions of the people treating you.
Read more about our editorial process, our use of AI, and our corrections policy.
Spotted a problem? Report an error — a factual mistake, broken or outdated source, confusing wording, or anything that seems unsafe. Please do not include names, medical record numbers, dates of birth, addresses, or other identifying medical information in your report.
After using this page, do you understand what to do next?
Anonymous — we only record the answer, never who gave it.
