Skip to main content
Cancer Explained
Donate
Beginner 9 min readSource checked

Picking Up the Pieces: What Survivorship Actually Involves After NCI's Own Account

A therapist and a survivor wrote a guide to the psychological work after cancer treatment ends. What it covers, and how it compares with NCI's account of survivorship and follow-up care.

NCI source

NCI — Adjusting to Life After Treatment

Woman with a tote bag checks in at a clinic reception desk with an imaging scanner visible beyond.
Checking In At Reception

Key fact

The Internet Archive catalog record lists the book as Picking Up the Pieces: Moving Forward After Surviving Cancer, by Sherri Magee with Kathy Scalzo, published by Raincoast Books in 2006.

The short answer

Sherri Magee, a therapist, and Kathy Scalzo, a cancer survivor, wrote this guide about the period after active treatment ends, when many people expect relief and instead find new difficulty. It focuses on the psychological adjustment of survivorship rather than on medical follow-up care. This page adds NCI's own account of what follow-up care and survivorship actually involve.

  • The Internet Archive catalog record lists the book as Picking Up the Pieces: Moving Forward After Surviving Cancer, by Sherri Magee with Kathy Scalzo, published by Raincoast Books in 2006.

  • The book's stated focus is the psychological aftermath of treatment, not medical follow-up protocols, and it is written for readers who have already finished active treatment.

  • NCI defines a cancer survivor as anyone from the time of diagnosis through the rest of their life, a broader definition than the finished-treatment period the book addresses.

  • NCI recommends a follow-up care plan summarizing treatment received and outlining next steps, which it says can give a person a greater sense of control after treatment ends.

About this book

Author:
Sherri Magee and Kathy Scalzo
First published:
2006
Publisher:
Raincoast Books
Type:
Practical guide
Pages:
319
ISBN:
9781551929019
Cancer covered:
General, all types, focused on the period after active treatment ends

Edition and publication detailsFind it in a library

This page describes a published book for education. We have no financial relationship with any author or publisher and earn nothing if you buy it. A book — including one written by a doctor — is not medical advice, and one person’s experience is not a guide to your own care.

Choose how you want to understand this

The full explanation.

What the book is

Picking Up the Pieces: Moving Forward After Surviving Cancer addresses a period that surprises many people: the time right after treatment ends, when friends and family expect relief and the person who was sick often feels something closer to disorientation. The Internet Archive's catalog record credits Sherri Magee, a therapist, with Kathy Scalzo, and dates the Raincoast Books edition to 2006.

The book's premise is that the end of active treatment is not the end of the psychological work of having had cancer. Scans, chemotherapy infusions and radiation appointments gave shape and purpose to the weeks of treatment. When they stop, many survivors describe a loss of structure alongside relief, along with fear that without active monitoring, a recurrence could go unnoticed.

This is a book about that specific gap, not a general cancer guide and not a treatment manual. It assumes the reader has already been through diagnosis and treatment and is now living in the aftermath, a period the book treats as its own distinct phase deserving its own guidance.

What's inside

The book is organized around the common emotional territory of post-treatment life: anxiety about follow-up scans, changed relationships with a body that has been through treatment, shifts in how survivors relate to friends and family who assume the ordeal is simply over, and the specific fear of recurrence that NCI's own materials also identify as a common feature of survivorship.

Sections address practical adjustment too: returning to work, resuming intimacy and relationships, and managing the expectations of people who do not understand why finishing treatment did not immediately restore the person to how they were before. The book draws on Magee's clinical experience as a therapist working with cancer patients, giving it a more structured therapeutic framework than a purely personal account would have.

There is no nutrition or recipe content, and no detailed medical information about specific late effects by treatment type. The book's lane is psychological and social adjustment, not clinical follow-up. Where a medical guide would organize around scan schedules and lab values, this book organizes around what a survivor is likely to be feeling at each stage of re-entry into ordinary life, and what has helped other people in that position cope with it.

What NCI recommends for the transition the book describes

Because the book's territory, adjusting to life after treatment, overlaps directly with NCI's own survivorship materials, it is useful to set the two side by side. NCI recommends that patients ask their care team for a follow-up care plan when treatment ends: a written summary of the treatment received, along with a schedule for future monitoring and a list of who to contact for which concerns. NCI states that having this kind of plan "may give you a sense of control with your health after treatment," language that maps closely onto the disorientation the book spends most of its pages describing.

NCI also names emotional adjustment explicitly as part of survivorship, not as a separate or optional concern: it discusses "adjusting to physical and emotional changes after cancer treatment," managing fear of recurrence, and the effect of cancer on families, alongside physical monitoring. That a federal cancer institute and a therapist-authored self-help book converge on treating the emotional transition as a legitimate, expected part of survivorship is worth noting, since it is not automatically what a newly finished patient expects to hear from either source.

Where it is strongest

The book's central contribution is naming a period that survivors often find isolating precisely because outsiders assume it should feel like victory. NCI's own account of survivorship supports this directly: NCI states that "the transition to a new normal can be hard," and separately identifies "coping with the fear of recurrence" as part of what survivorship involves. A book built entirely around this specific, under-discussed difficulty fills a real gap that a purely medical follow-up guide would not address.

The therapeutic structure Magee brings, informed by actual clinical work with survivors rather than only personal experience, gives the book's coping strategies more grounding than a purely anecdotal account would offer. Readers looking for language to describe what they are feeling, and reassurance that the feeling is common rather than a personal failing, are the book's clearest audience.

Where to read it carefully

The book is from 2006 and speaks in general terms about survivorship rather than addressing the specific late effects associated with particular treatments, which have become better characterized since then. A reader wanting to understand the long-term risks specific to, for example, a particular chemotherapy drug or a course of radiation to a specific body region, will need more current, treatment-specific information than this book provides.

The book is also focused on adults and does not address the distinct survivorship issues facing survivors of childhood cancer, which involve different developmental and long-term health considerations. NCI's own materials on childhood cancer survivorship cover that territory in more depth than a general adult-focused guide can.

Because the book is built around a specific emotional narrative, readers whose post-treatment experience does not match its central story, for instance those who feel mostly relief with little of the described disorientation, may find some sections do not describe their experience, and that is a reasonable and common outcome too.

Prevention, as the evidence has it

The book does not present itself as risk-reduction guidance, but survivors are often especially attentive to anything framed as prevention, since they are managing both the anxiety of a first cancer and, for some, a modestly elevated risk of a second one depending on their original treatment. It is worth being precise about what is and is not established.

CDC and NCI describe several factors associated with lower cancer risk at a population level: not using tobacco, limiting alcohol, maintaining a healthy body weight, and staying current with recommended screening. None of these factors, individually or together, guarantee anything for a specific person, and none of them explain why any individual survivor's original cancer occurred. The book itself largely avoids the trap of implying survivors caused their own illness through lifestyle choices, and that restraint matches how NCI frames modifiable risk factors: as population associations, not individual explanations.

For survivors specifically, some original cancer treatments carry their own documented risks for certain second cancers or other long-term health effects, which is a different and more individualized question than general population risk factors. That is precisely the kind of information a follow-up care plan, discussed below, is meant to capture and personalize. Survivors of childhood cancer face a distinct version of this question; see late effects of childhood cancer treatment for that specific territory.

Catching it earlier: what the signs actually are

Survivorship includes an ongoing relationship with the possibility of recurrence, and the book spends real time on the anxiety this creates. It is useful to be precise, separately from the book's psychological framing, about what NCI actually says a survivor should do about a new symptom.

NCI's general symptom guidance states that a change that "does not get better after a few weeks" warrants a doctor's evaluation, and that cancer often causes no pain, so pain should not be treated as the threshold for concern. For someone with a cancer history, a new or persistent symptom is not necessarily a sign of recurrence, but it is not something to explain away either. A follow-up care plan, discussed below, typically specifies what to watch for and who to call. For general symptom guidance, see cancer symptoms.

Who this book suits

It suits a reader who has finished active treatment and is surprised to find the emotional weight of the experience did not end when treatment did. It is particularly useful for someone feeling isolated by the mismatch between how they are expected to feel, relieved, done, and how they actually feel.

It suits less well someone still in active treatment, someone looking for medical guidance on monitoring and late effects, or a caregiver of a childhood cancer survivor, whose needs are addressed more specifically elsewhere. For medical follow-up detail, NCI's survivorship materials and a treating oncologist are the better resource; this book's contribution is the psychological account the medical literature generally does not provide. A caregiver managing their own strain during this period may also find caregiver burnout useful alongside this book.

It is also a reasonable recommendation for a partner or close family member who is confused by a survivor's continued anxiety once treatment has visibly ended, since the book gives language for a reaction that can otherwise look, from the outside, like an overreaction to good news. Reading it alongside the survivor, rather than only recommending it to them, is likely to be more useful than handing it over unread, and it may open a conversation neither person had found a way to start on their own.

Cancer Explained is free and ad-free, and you can support this work if it helped.

Sources

This page discusses Picking Up the Pieces for education. It is not medical advice, and nothing here is a judgement of anyone's real medical care.

Words to know

Tap any term to see what it means.

Browse the full glossary →

Woman gestures while explaining documents on a table to a man and an older woman seated across from her.

Common questions

Who wrote Picking Up the Pieces and what is their background?

Sherri Magee is a therapist, and the book was written with Kathy Scalzo, described in the Internet Archive's catalog record as her co-author. The 2006 Raincoast Books edition addresses psychological adjustment after cancer treatment ends.

Is this a medical guide to follow-up care?

No. It focuses on the emotional and psychological work of adjusting to life after active treatment, not on the schedule of scans and tests a survivorship care plan would include. For medical follow-up guidance, NCI's own survivorship materials are the better source.

Does finishing treatment mean the difficulty is over?

Not necessarily. NCI itself notes that some survivors continue to have physical or emotional issues after treatment ends, and describes the transition to a new normal as something that can be hard. The book's premise matches this.

Who is a cancer survivor, exactly?

NCI's definition is broad: a person is considered a survivor from the time of diagnosis through the balance of their life, which includes people still in treatment as well as those who have finished it. The book's use of the term is narrower, focused specifically on the post-treatment period.

How current is the book's content?

It is from 2006. Its psychological framework holds up reasonably well. Anything about specific treatments or their long-term effects should be checked against more current sources.

Questions to ask your doctor

Being prepared helps you get the most out of your appointments. Save or print these questions.

Open my question list

Tap a question to save it to your list (kept on this device).

Human Connection Layer

Speak With Trained Specialists & Human Navigators

Cancer Explained provides educational guidance, but does not replace trained specialists, social workers, or your medical team.

Free & Confidential

Talk to a trained cancer information specialist

Free, confidential assistance from NCI Cancer Information Service via phone, chat, or email.

Contact your oncology team

Locate after-hours contact numbers, portal messages, or urgent triage phone lines.

Find a patient navigator

Get one-on-one help with appointments, logistics, translation, and care coordination.

Find a genetic counselor

Discuss inherited mutation risk, family history, and genetic testing options.

Find an oncology social worker

Access emotional counseling, family support groups, and mental health resources.

Find a financial navigator

Locate copay assistance foundations, grant programs, and lodging/travel support.

Find a clinical-trial specialist

Search matching studies and speak with NCI trial information specialists.

Get urgent help

Immediate emergency guidance for fever (>100.4°F during chemo), severe pain, or shortness of breath.

Know someone who needs this?

Plenty of people are looking for something like this and do not know where to start. If this would help a friend or someone you love, send it on — we have written an opening line so you do not have to stare at an empty message. You can change every word of it.

Email itText itWhatsApp

Your message is written and sent in your own email or messaging app — we never see who you send it to, and nothing is added to any list.

Plain-language explanation of the published sources cited on this page. AI-assisted, source-checked, not clinician-reviewed.

Written by: Cancer ExplainedSources last checked: 2026-09-03 what this meansLast updated: 2026-09-03Next planned review: 2028-09-03

How this page was created

Cancer Explained does not originate medical claims. Every page restates guidance already published by the National Cancer Institute, the CDC, the USPSTF and the FDA, in plain language, with the source cited so you can check the original yourself. AI does the translating and organizing; automated checks test claims, citations, clarity and safety before anything publishes, and this is translation and navigation, not clinical judgment. Nothing here is personal medical advice, and no page can account for your particular situation.

Editorial status — Source checked. This page was written with AI assistance and checked line by line against the sources listed on it. That confirms the sources support what the page says. It is not a medical review, and it does not confirm the page is complete or right for your situation.

General education. Low-risk educational or organizational content. Medical facts are cited to authoritative sources.

Human medical review: not completed. Pages here are not signed off by a clinician before they publish. That is not an oversight we are quietly working around: we restate published guidance and cite it, so the authority belongs to the source rather than to us, and every page names where its claims come from — you can verify us instead of trusting us. Where a volunteer clinician has reviewed a page, their name and credentials appear on it; where no name appears, no clinician has checked it. We are glad to have reviewers and are recruiting them, and we do not hold pages back waiting for one. Use this site to understand your situation and to ask better questions of the people treating you.

Our editorial processHow we use AIReport an error

How this page was created

Cancer Explained does not originate medical claims. Every page restates guidance already published by the National Cancer Institute, the CDC, the USPSTF and the FDA, in plain language, with the source cited so you can check the original yourself. AI does the translating and organizing; automated checks test claims, citations, clarity and safety before anything publishes, and this is translation and navigation, not clinical judgment. Nothing here is personal medical advice, and no page can account for your particular situation.

Editorial status: Source checked This page was written with AI assistance and checked line by line against the sources listed on it. That confirms the sources support what the page says. It is not a medical review, and it does not confirm the page is complete or right for your situation.

Human medical review: not completed. Pages here are not signed off by a clinician before they publish. That is not an oversight we are quietly working around: we restate published guidance and cite it, so the authority belongs to the source rather than to us, and every page names where its claims come from — you can verify us instead of trusting us. Where a volunteer clinician has reviewed a page, their name and credentials appear on it; where no name appears, no clinician has checked it. We are glad to have reviewers and are recruiting them, and we do not hold pages back waiting for one. Use this site to understand your situation and to ask better questions of the people treating you.

Read more about our editorial process, our use of AI, and our corrections policy.

Spotted a problem? Report an error — a factual mistake, broken or outdated source, confusing wording, or anything that seems unsafe. Please do not include names, medical record numbers, dates of birth, addresses, or other identifying medical information in your report.

After using this page, do you understand what to do next?

Anonymous — we only record the answer, never who gave it.