Quiz: Prop 65 and Coffee: The Acrylamide Story

0 of 4 answered

1. Q1.Why was coffee nearly required to carry a Prop 65 cancer warning?

   AIt contains caffeineBRoasting coffee forms acrylamide, a listed chemicalCIt is importedDIt contains sugar

   Check answer
2. Q2.What did California ultimately decide about coffee?

   AIt must carry a cancer warningBIt does not require a Prop 65 cancer warning (rule effective 2019)CIt should be bannedDNothing

   Check answer
3. Q3.What evidence supported the decision?

   AA single small studyBIARC's 2016 finding that coffee is 'not classifiable' and may lower some cancer risksCCoffee company lobbying aloneDNo evidence

   Check answer
4. Q4.What broader lesson does the coffee story illustrate?

   AHazard always equals riskBThat evidence of real-world risk can override a purely hazard-based warning triggerCThat warnings are always accurateDThat coffee is dangerous

   Check answer

This quiz checks understanding of educational content only. It is not medical advice. Read: Prop 65 and Coffee: The Acrylamide Story.